It does, but then again maybe it'll force some necessary changes. Honestly, I feel the product line break out is not only just confusing, but also is like a class-structure. I'm lucky I can afford Plus right now, but what happens in the future should my government decide that us retirees and disabled aren't worth a penny and cut our benefits? I won't be able to afford the luxury and will lose any work I've done on my routes while using Plus. I'm not being sarcastic here; I'm serious. With inflation and the winter fuel prices skyrocketing, that extra bit we come up with annually or monthly can add up pretty quick and be better put elsewhere where it's needed. Priorities are priorities especially when it comes to living.
The code base they use has all the features embedded so that based on subscription level it's your user account that turns these on. Instead of doing that, N3V should offer either a subscription version or a full version of everything to everyone. The price may be high, but it is what it is since most games these days are in the same ballpark. Instead of turning on the features based on subscription, the user can pick and choose which features he/she wants by choosing the level of the program.
There could be an "Easy Mode". This has Classic Surveyor only, access to the DLS and everything else.
"Advance Mode" has all features enabled just like Plus does, and finally there's Driver-only mode.
Driver-only mode. There can be a simple session editor and access to the DLS but nothing complex as we have now. This is great for beginners and for those who just want to drive trains. There are many new users who come into the forums thoroughly confused and overwhelmed. Unlike the rest of us who have weathered the advancements since the early days, these people in many instances are walking into a minefield of advanced features. We see this day in and day out with posts with "Help! I don't know how to do this, or all I wanted to do is drive trains." People shouldn't need a Bachelor's or Master's degree in Computer Science and Engineering to run a train simulator. Games are supposed to be fun and not work.
The advantages of this are there are fewer support requests from users, the product skew is easier to manage and overall, less confusion even from long time users.