A user that actually uses the program and makes great routes, proposes something
or points out where it can be improved, followed by pware and tony defending the status quo
of the current WIP phase it is in. This is counter productive.
The Lead game designer (there should be such a pro) designs based on what users want
the CEO sets the main path/timeline and makes sure the money comes in
the programmer, programs what the Lead game designer asks for
All starts with good base concept, not bits and pieces thrown together and defended
S2 will be great in a few years, there is no hurry whatsoever, cause S1 functions fine
an interface should need NO manual at all if designed well
I’m sorry but Pware actually uses the program, provides lots of helpful advice in forums and in the wiki. As they use the program, they are entitled to put forth their views. Not everyone is going to have the same views.