I like what I see with this new PBR feature as well; but am concerned if trees/foliage would again present the problems, and headache it had been converting my route over to TaNE standards (from TS12), with TRS2018!
Tell me about it!!! :hehe: The last time it took months... ! You see, my route had mostly McGuirel's trees on it
Tell me about it!!! :hehe: The last time it took months... ! You see, my route had mostly McGuirel's trees on it
I am not a newbie Sir. I had used that tool as well, but it's also a question of width, height and the aesthetics of the trees needing "replacing" -which was practically all. In other-words research; going through each likely candidate for just the right tree for each needed replacement. [Doesn't help I can be such a perfectionist either! ] Else you might find some areas of your route with trees too densely-packed! Not to mention the large variety of trees I needed to convert.
Yes. You are correct!The other problem would be the "replace asset tool" doesn't work on faulty assets as of yet, unless I missed something.
Cheers,
TrainzPlayer14
What I did was, I converted all those Mcguirel trees which I knew would be faulty in TaNE w/ MSGSapper trees in TS12 -not concerned what kind of tree they'd be replacing- then placing on a piece of paper what tree I had replaced the Mcguirel trees with... in other words, I "coded" the trees (for later use)! But effective!