That's because you make a silly claim without any evidence, or even a sensible argument to back it up. It will be natural for people to think that you are only trying to start an argument.That was pretty off topic, and an insult …
"But it all boils down to the plain and simple fact: That you previously could buy a legacy Trainz game for $20 to $70, and it would run forever, and it would never automatically shut down after the 365 days expire".
Well, you can now buy a current version of the Trainz game for $70 and it will never shut down.
Then you suggest that parents are comparing $150 per year plus a $2,000 PC against the one-time price of $70, ignoring the fact that they need a PC whether they go the subscription route or the one-time purchase, and ignoring the free additions that come with the subscription.
If you want a sensible discussion you need to start from an accurate or supportable claim. Otherwise you are just stirring the pot, and unfortunately a lot of people respond to that.