NSWGR_46Class
Just call my Captain Rude
It has been photo shopped quite a bit to get it to look right - but if you look close there are a few give always on how its done but its a great skin-But yes it is based on photos
Australian screenshots
- Thread starter cook
- Start date
I made the Ticket Machine Shelter and Platform Awning in max so i can send them your way if you think they would be useful mate as long as i can get a bit of feedback on how they are ?, I'm in Melbourne for the rest of the week so next weekend i can send em your way.
Cheers Mick.
That awning and shelter are exactly what I've been looking for myself Mick. I wonder if I could score a copy as well. My CM is playing up at the moment so I haven't been able to import those pylons you gave me as yet.
Railwayz
Ghostryder
QDRN CEO
matruck
Warabrook looks great, if there is anything you need shots of from that area i should be in the Newie area in a couple of weeks so maybe able to get you some shots, if i can help drop me a list of what you need and i will see what i can do.
NSWGR_46 Cclass, the guards vans look great.
Littlebondi i got your message if and when my net worked the wet weather has played havoc with it not to mention i have not been well. you have an answer.
Ghosty
Warabrook looks great, if there is anything you need shots of from that area i should be in the Newie area in a couple of weeks so maybe able to get you some shots, if i can help drop me a list of what you need and i will see what i can do.
NSWGR_46 Cclass, the guards vans look great.
Littlebondi i got your message if and when my net worked the wet weather has played havoc with it not to mention i have not been well. you have an answer.
Ghosty
2 different National Rails (one the big lettered one, the other the last NR version), the green/gold AN coloured version as well and dirty and clean versions of these too. The DL Class PN in the screenshots is a dirty version plus TS09/10 and TS12 specific versions too, the TS12 versions will be first when DLS upload time comes around. I only finished the 1st LOD of the PN version this morning, the others will still be some weeks away as I take it a bit easy now. Creator's burnout, you know
.Cheers
VinnyBarb
misterchugg
Active member
nicely done falcon500
trainfan2017
Active member
Hey vinnybarb, are you having the numbers on the front of the nose?2 different National Rails (one the big lettered one, the other the last NR version), the green/gold AN coloured version as well and dirty and clean versions of these too. The DL Class PN in the screenshots is a dirty version plus TS09/10 and TS12 specific versions too, the TS12 versions will be first when DLS upload time comes around. I only finished the 1st LOD of the PN version this morning, the others will still be some weeks away as I take it a bit easy now. Creator's burnout, you know
Cheers
VinnyBarb
cheers
David
misterchugg
Active member
Munbilla town help needed
hi
this is the start of Munbilla on the Fassifern valley line
would anybody know where i can find photos of this area from the mid of last centuiry
i had some, but they were very small and hard to see
the library in Boonah and Beaudesert had nothing better either
thanks
ron
hi
this is the start of Munbilla on the Fassifern valley line
would anybody know where i can find photos of this area from the mid of last centuiry
i had some, but they were very small and hard to see
the library in Boonah and Beaudesert had nothing better either
thanks
ron
Some nice work there everyone!
Mick - Warabrook station looks great! Having been there many times myself I can safely say you hit the nail on the head! The platform canopies/shelters would also make a great addition to some stations on my route!
Herbert - great work on the DL class, very muchly looking forward to these beauties!
Keep up the great work all!
Matt
Mick - Warabrook station looks great! Having been there many times myself I can safely say you hit the nail on the head! The platform canopies/shelters would also make a great addition to some stations on my route!
Herbert - great work on the DL class, very muchly looking forward to these beauties!
Keep up the great work all!
Matt
TheWaluigiKing
Trainz Ninja
Nice looking Shells there!:hehe:
He/she did a good job.
He/she did a good job.
According to the terms you don't need permission, you are just not aloud to make money from it to which is fair enough, but read through the terms there is a grey area so it would be best to leave it of till i find out, i will email them and make sure of it that way ill have the return email to fall back on.
steve
steve
Here we go again as stated before I DID NOT BUILD THIS version of the Sydney Opera House, it was built by [ jw_n_mo ] and downloaded from [ Trindle 3D Warehouse ]
http://www.sendspace.com/file/m95jrc
steve123
http://www.sendspace.com/file/m95jrc
steve123
Just a thought about 3DWarehouse stuff making its way onto the DLS via RubyTMIX. There is the potential for many copies of the same item ending up on the DLS via different "authors", thus causing some confusion when included in published routes and so on.I hope you got permission from him or her to import that into Trainz
Now I'm not suggesting that any form of restriction should be applied, I'm not even sure if this would be a real issue, I was just wondering if anybody else had considered this and had any ideas as to how it might be avoided or minimised.
My only thought was that, before putting a 3DW item on the DLS a budding publisher should check to see if the items already been uploaded. This would only really be viable if the item could be readily identified on the DLS in some way. I think there used to be some form of "custom" tag that could be added to a config.txt file, if that's still available it might be useful.
It was actually not my intention that people would simply flood the DLS with straight conversions from the 3D warehouse. What I had hoped would happen is that people would download the models from there, then apply the necessary extra steps to make them efficient in Trainz, then put them on the DLS. Also we should, of course, remember to acknowledge the author and the warehouse itself as the original source of the model... although not 'required' by Google it is certainly proper etiquette; and I do get the sense that Google wants to see that anyway, whether they say so or not.
Originally Posted by johnwhelan
Just a comment on textures unless you took the photograph yourself you need explicit permission to use these. Just because its on the web doesn't mean you have permission from the copyright holder.Cheerio John
From the Google 3D Warehouse Terms of Service Agreement:
From Section 8 Content in the Services section:
"For the avoidance of doubt, you may modify, distribute, and create derivative works of Content uploaded by other users in 3D Warehouse."
From Section 11. Content license from you:
(c) By publicly posting or displaying the content you give other end users of the Services a perpetual, sublicensable, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non-exclusive license to reproduce, adapt, modify, translate, publish, publicly perform, publicly display and distribute (subject to the restrictions set forth in Sections 11.4 and 20.3 of these Terms) any Content or derivative works thereof which you publicly post or display on or through the Services.