Mega-strong Diesel

Ghost42

Well-known member
Have noticed in the past steam locos that seem to pull too well under AI, this afternoon I tested out a route (while I got on with other things)) using AI and the Diesel pulled 1700 ton up a 2% grade at a steady 40mph which by my calculations requires at least 6000hp.
Can a realistic performance be obtained from AI or get in the cab and diy?
Class 47 on a US route, I love the cab :)
 
Seems impossible. Class 47s only had around 2500hp. Deltics only produced around 3500hp and even the most powerful British diesel, Kestrel, only produced 4000. You'd need a Union Pacific DDA40X to pull that train at that speed. Or a Class 91, but I'm guessing the route is not electrified :)
(Believe it or not, Class 91s have been rated at 6300hp, so they are about as powerful as the DDA40Xs!)
 
AI's are not effected by train weight as they have no definition of tractive force to resistance, so they'll pull anything, for example 340kn will take 1500 tonnes up a 2% but 280kn will stall, if AI's had a T.E limiter then they'll stall too.

Cheers.
 
I haven't got the loads book in front of me but I'm fairly certain a Class 47 would not even be able to lift that weight up a 2% (1 in 50) gradient without either being double headed or banked in the rear.

Off the top of my head, the overnight sleeper trains out of Inverness used to load to ~15 Mark One vehicles, around 600 tonnes trailing with a ruling gradient of around 1 in 60.

The old 1S19 Bristol to Glasgow/Edinburgh overnight was a similar load with a Class 47 and had to be banked up the Lickey Incline (1 in 37) from Bromsgrove to Blackwell.

Sadly - with the possible exception of the Chinese and Russian stuff in TS12 - in my experience the physics of most of the traction (and DMU/EMU) in Trainz old and new is seriously OP. Add to that most of the assets don't even consume fuel so it takes a pretty huge dent out of the realism factor. It's something N3V and asset creators ought to be aiming to improve, IMHO.
 
Back
Top