Landrvr1 Content Sharing/Request Thread

Hello! I'm unaware of whether or not this thread is still up, however, if anyone has Landrvr1's South Shore Line EMU Cars, may I ask to have them sent to me? Thank you in advance.
 
Howdy all! I'm bumping my own thread here to inquire as to whether anybody has the CNS&M battery-electric locomotives working in TRS19? I've been out of the loop for a while.

edit: Disregard, I actually managed to find my TRS2006-era backups and update them myself.
 
Last edited:
Thread's been dead for a while, i've been waiting (quite patiently) for
CB&QDome_interior,<kuid:45651:55001>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 193,<kuid:45651:35>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 251,<kuid:45651:33>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 375,<kuid:45651:30>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 424,<kuid:45651:31>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 427,<kuid:45651:40>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 452,<kuid:45651:32>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4717,<kuid:45651:34>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4719,<kuid:45651:38>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4719,<kuid:45651:138>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4720,<kuid:45651:39>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4742,<kuid:45651:36>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 905,<kuid:45651:37>
and the NYC/PRR/IC E units
 
For old style EMD E units, see here. [link to content pirating site removed]

Moderator note:
Do NOT post links to a content pirating website again or expect to be banned. See rule 15 of the CoC.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The strangest thing is how easily some people share your email address with an Eastern European site. Good luck to them.
Ignorance is the root of many problems.
 
Could anyone send me the california zephyr coaches?
CB&QDome_interior,<kuid:45651:55001>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 193,<kuid:45651:35>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 251,<kuid:45651:33>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 375,<kuid:45651:30>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 424,<kuid:45651:31>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 427,<kuid:45651:40>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 452,<kuid:45651:32>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4717,<kuid:45651:34>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4719,<kuid:45651:38>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4719,<kuid:45651:138>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4720,<kuid:45651:39>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4742,<kuid:45651:36>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 905,<kuid:45651:37>
 
Moderator comment:

Reminder: Please refrain from referring people to content pirating websites and discussing them (including this post). Links will be removed (please report them), people will be warned or banned.
See rules 15 and 18 of the Code of Conduct.
How was i supposed to know it was a pirate site. I doesn't say anywhere on the site that it is.
 
Last edited:
How was i supposed to know [name of content pirating website removed] was a pirate site. I doesn't say anywhere on the site that it is.
oh, I don't know... Let's see...
-Attempts to put malware on your machine
-Looks scummy
-Looks Scummy
-Somehow has old routes (Looking at you, ale_beer's mars and Drummond Mountain Railway) that aren't on the dls
-Looks VERY SUSPICOUS!!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's presumably why you got a warning and not a ban.
Exactly that.

And a formal warning has now been added as a bonus.

And this ends that off-topic discussion (again).
Read the CoC (link at the top of this page or in my previous post) if anyone still has no clue how or what, with extra attention to the already mentioned rule numbers.

And just for those not getting it:
"End" does not mean "quote or reply to". Feel free to PM me instead. Don't be surprised if you don't get a reply within a few months (if ever).
And if a URL or name gets removed from your post that does not mean "please keep using it" but instead means "you should not use it".

... and just to be sure...:
No, you should not put a baby in a microwave.
 
ah, yes. yes.
CB&QDome_interior,<kuid:45651:55001>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 193,<kuid:45651:35>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 251,<kuid:45651:33>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 375,<kuid:45651:30>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 424,<kuid:45651:31>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 427,<kuid:45651:40>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 452,<kuid:45651:32>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4717,<kuid:45651:34>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4719,<kuid:45651:38>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4719,<kuid:45651:138>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4720,<kuid:45651:39>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 4742,<kuid:45651:36>
CB&Q California Zephyr - 905,<kuid:45651:37>
 
Getting this discussion back on topic, I'm on the fence as to what to do about this old thread.

On the one hand, I get a kick out of the fact that it's still going after 15 years (I can even go back and edit my OP if I wanted to) but on the other, it seems as though there really isn't much getting shared anymore. I'd take a more active role myself, but my Landrvr1 content stash hasn't been updated beyond TRS2006 standards, and frankly, going back to get each of those assets fixed and running in TRS19 (at least outside of the 1 or 2 that I'd regularly use) just isn't a high priority for me at this time.

A few weeks ago, I contemplated asking the mods to lock this discussion, but ultimately decided against it. At the end of the day, I figure there's no real harm in leaving it open, outside of disappointment at the lack of replies (sorry, marmalade32). You never know, some good samaritan with the time on their hands could one day decide to update all of this old content and get it back out there.

What do others think?
 
Last edited:
Getting this discussion back on topic, I'm on the fence as to what to do about this old thread.

On the one hand, I get a kick out of the fact that it's still going after 15 years (I can even go back and edit my OP if I wanted to) but on the other, it seems as though there really isn't much getting shared anymore. I'd take a more active role myself, but my Landrvr1 content stash hasn't been updated beyond TRS2006 standards, and frankly, going back to get each of those assets fixed and running in TRS19 (at least outside of the 1 or 2 that I'd regularly use) just isn't a high priority for me at this time.

A few weeks ago, I contemplated asking the mods to lock this discussion, but ultimately decided against it. At the end of the day, I figure there's no real harm in leaving it open, outside of disappointment at the lack of replies (sorry, marmalade32). You never know, some good samaritan with the time on their hands could one day decide to update all of this old content and get it back out there.

What do others think?
It's fine, Let it stay open.
 
Back
Top