Well, then it's just to wait for that day, hehe.
VERY NICE job.
// Erik from Sweden
GMax and 3DSMax (And any other modeling program) screenies/renders
- Thread starter Mr.Kamikaze
- Start date
VERY NICE job.
// Erik from Sweden
LOL, I was just thinking about making one of those the other day..... Looks great!!! I'll wait!
simulatortrain
jointed freaking rails
Love that ore car!
TheRichMan
Meh-Tra
Woah that looks sweet! Always room for more cabooses (cabeese?) 
Woah that looks sweet! Always room for more cabooses (cabeese?)
Caboosen...?
On the New Haven...
On the New Haven they were "hacks," which obviates the plural problem (g).Woah that looks sweet! Always room for more cabooses (cabeese?)
G'day matruck,
...nice work there, Mick. One 'small' detail, though..
...if that is meant to be standard "Stramit" ™ brand Wall Siding, there should be 6 'spaces' (7 ribs) for each 1200mm of wall length. I suggest you check your scaling. As good as it looks, it doesn't look quite right from where I sit...
Jerker {
}
...nice work there, Mick. One 'small' detail, though..
...if that is meant to be standard "Stramit" ™ brand Wall Siding, there should be 6 'spaces' (7 ribs) for each 1200mm of wall length. I suggest you check your scaling. As good as it looks, it doesn't look quite right from where I sit...
Jerker {
}
Last edited:
nikitka1988
Virtual Railroad Tycoon
Very nice Mick. This is exactly what I need for my route building.
CattyPatty
CEO of BTL RR
will that be on the dls or a private site
socalwb909
Photo Creator
i like it mick good job
joe
joe
G'day matruck,
...it seems you're 'on a winner' there, Mick but I just can't understand by your statement that ..."...if i was to make the cladding any smaller in scale mate it would look a lot worse then what it does here now..."... I can, perhaps, observe that a reduction in the scale of the mapping vertically along the height of the walls could make things look decidedly odd (and the present 'setting' appears acceptable) but you do know that you can scale a map in either dimension independently, don't you? So, I would scale the mapping horizontally, ONLY, to obtain the proper scaling (on all four external walls equally, of course)...
...I'm assuming here, of course, that the Stramit™ 'cladding is a texture only and not actual mesh...
Jerker {}
...it seems you're 'on a winner' there, Mick but I just can't understand by your statement that ..."...if i was to make the cladding any smaller in scale mate it would look a lot worse then what it does here now..."... I can, perhaps, observe that a reduction in the scale of the mapping vertically along the height of the walls could make things look decidedly odd (and the present 'setting' appears acceptable) but you do know that you can scale a map in either dimension independently, don't you? So, I would scale the mapping horizontally, ONLY, to obtain the proper scaling (on all four external walls equally, of course)...
...I'm assuming here, of course, that the Stramit™ 'cladding is a texture only and not actual mesh...
Jerker {
}
Last edited:
In Gmax I would scale that wall in Texture Editor. It means doing them one at a time but it would only effect the horizontal plane and so increase the amount of corrugations per metre.
However, I do not know which 3D package is being used in this case. Using Scale in Gmax changes the whole image as far as I can make out, handy for the guns on my warships but it wouldn't work on a single wall.
The Provisioning Shed is a very nice model in other respects so would only improve by more corrugations. A 'Well done' is definitely deserved.
Angela
However, I do not know which 3D package is being used in this case. Using Scale in Gmax changes the whole image as far as I can make out, handy for the guns on my warships but it wouldn't work on a single wall.
The Provisioning Shed is a very nice model in other respects so would only improve by more corrugations. A 'Well done' is definitely deserved.
Angela