I’m finding it increasingly difficult to know what is, and isn’t, TS2009 track.
Much of what is labelled TS2009 works perfectly well in earlier versions. I tend to go with seeing what I like and then downloading it, and trying it. If it doesn’t work, sometimes a minor tweak in the config.txt file will sort it, otherwise there nothing lost – I simply delete it.
I’ve seen some screenshots of some newer track which seems to have a very high definition ballast textures. Unfortunately with some, when viewed close up, the effect gives the appearance of shiny pebbles or polished marble rather than rough and ready ballast. The ballast edges just seem to fade out rather than have the speckled effect which the older tracks have, which helps with the visual merging into the surrounding ground textures. Furthermore some of the newer rails, when viewed close to, look out of focus compared with the pin sharp (and in my view unrealistic) ballast.
What does seem to work well are the tracks made with realistic sharply focused rails which stand above realistic looking sleepers and fasteners, nice shadowing and a bit of rust and grime under each of the rails. Setting those effects against lower definition ballast increases the illusion of realism IMHO. From that point of view, the ZPZ Tor beton tracks are a triumph.
I guess 
