Like it or not, that is what pays the bills at N3V.
The alternative looks very much like "Open Rails" and other community based hobby and gaming software. Throw in the small niche market that is the Railroad Sim/Gaming community and you get an over reliance on a small, and highly variable, number of talented but dedicated individuals working part time. Reading the Open Rails Wikipedia article revealed that there were several years when they had only one active developer. Development time is slow and new releases even slower. I recently noted (and posted in these forums) that the latest new development in Open Rail allows users, for the first time, to drive a route in the opposite direction. I am not criticising Open Rails but merely pointing out where community based development usually ends up.
There are many things in life where those who can afford it get more benefits than those who cannot. In an ideal world this would not be the case, everyone would have equal access to everything.
I would love to buy a brand new Porche for the price of a second hand Toyota but that is not going to happen. I am a member of a licensed club and pay an annual membership fee. Anyone can walk in off the street to drink at the club bar, eat at the restaurant, workout at the gym, see the entertainment shows but as a paid up member I get discounts on everything (including food and drinks) and access to deals that outsiders do not get. That is why I pay the annual fee. Is that fair? It is actually the members, not the "walk-ins", who keep the club going and pay their bills.
Tony has posted that the subscription system has allowed N3V to pay for additional programmers. If the exclusive "Gold only" DLC offering adds to this (by attracting new subscribers) then I am all in favour. But no-one has been able to point to any post from N3V that proves that these offerings will never be available, even at a price, to non-Gold members.
The alternative looks very much like "Open Rails" and other community based hobby and gaming software. Throw in the small niche market that is the Railroad Sim/Gaming community and you get an over reliance on a small, and highly variable, number of talented but dedicated individuals working part time. Reading the Open Rails Wikipedia article revealed that there were several years when they had only one active developer. Development time is slow and new releases even slower. I recently noted (and posted in these forums) that the latest new development in Open Rail allows users, for the first time, to drive a route in the opposite direction. I am not criticising Open Rails but merely pointing out where community based development usually ends up.
There are many things in life where those who can afford it get more benefits than those who cannot. In an ideal world this would not be the case, everyone would have equal access to everything.
I would love to buy a brand new Porche for the price of a second hand Toyota but that is not going to happen. I am a member of a licensed club and pay an annual membership fee. Anyone can walk in off the street to drink at the club bar, eat at the restaurant, workout at the gym, see the entertainment shows but as a paid up member I get discounts on everything (including food and drinks) and access to deals that outsiders do not get. That is why I pay the annual fee. Is that fair? It is actually the members, not the "walk-ins", who keep the club going and pay their bills.
Tony has posted that the subscription system has allowed N3V to pay for additional programmers. If the exclusive "Gold only" DLC offering adds to this (by attracting new subscribers) then I am all in favour. But no-one has been able to point to any post from N3V that proves that these offerings will never be available, even at a price, to non-Gold members.
Last edited: