nathanmallard
Well-known member
Sorry, accidental double post.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was thinking the same thing. Whilst American diesels are not ugly per se, they really aren't particularly attractive. Functional, but not really visually appealing. British and European diesels are much nicer to look at IMO, especially the early ones like the Deltic prototype, the Westerns and Warships, and 'Lion' and 'Kestrel'. The Alco FAs/PAs, the Baldwin RF16s and the F- and E- series streamliners are beautiful though, but the latter might have lasted longer if EMD had come up with a double-cabbed variant.
don't they have double end units in Australia railroads, blue and yellow?I was thinking the same thing. Whilst American diesels are not ugly per se, they really aren't particularly attractive. Functional, but not really visually appealing. British and European diesels are much nicer to look at IMO, especially the early ones like the Deltic prototype, the Westerns and Warships, and 'Lion' and 'Kestrel'. The Alco FAs/PAs, the Baldwin RF16s and the F- and E- series streamliners are beautiful though, but the latter might have lasted longer if EMD had come up with a double-cabbed variant.
I haven't seen an achievement for Hump Shunting in Trainz yet!...This Rail Tractor might fit into the definition of ugly...
Yes, I would think that any train so lacking in aerodynamic design should definitely qualify for the UGLY thread!Does this count as Ugly ?
...
Americans can't make good DMUs or cab cars.
And we wonder why people drive in front of Amtrak trains? If you saw this, you would definitely drive in front of it to get that horror from your eyes.Some cab cars can look good, but THIS...
![]()
I NEED BLEACH.![]()