TS2004 Content In TS2012 Routes?

[boleyd]

Why do authors release a route that is labeled as compatible with TS2012 but with vegetation from 2004? That 2004 stuff does not look good in TS2012. To keep my lists of various items reasonable I have erased all the vegetation that is not TS2012 compatible. When I download a promising route I stop the download as as soon as the the assets begin to download and look at them in the main-list. If I see lots of old, low quality, assets I can delete the download and the ancient assets that made there way to my system.

 

[Scottbe8]

Why do authors release a route that is labeled as compatible with TS2012 but with vegetation from 2004? That 2004 stuff does not look good in TS2012. To keep my lists of various items reasonable I have erased all the vegetation that is not TS2012 compatible. When I download a promising route I stop the download as as soon as the the assets begin to download and look at them in the main-list. If I see lots of old, low quality, assets I can delete the download and the ancient assets that made there way to my system.

It's up to the 2004 content creators if and when they update their assets to TS12 standards. In the meantime, deal with it and enjoy the route for what it is.

 

[rweber95]

I think that compatible with only means that it will install and run in TS12 without locking up or crashing. I doesn't mean it will be beautiful.

Bob Weber