Wouldn't you at all question a device that is 1 inch in front of your eyeball, shining it's un-natural light source focusing it on your retina, whether it was dangerous ?
Or would you simply (blindly) "TRUST" the Chinese manufacturer, who has released a new, largely untested device on the market, (as research into VR eye safety has never been fully researched ... we humans are the actual test ginuea pigs and lab rats)
Or would you blindly accept and "
assume"
that all products are safe, ie: "why would they dare put it on the market if it was unsafe" ? (even though VR safety has never been medically studied, nor medically researched to date)
You can't validly use idiotic obtuse unrelated analogies on other products, trying to prove your point about VR safety, ie:
1: Increased global radiation from 2 x prominent nuclear reactor disasters.
2: Air pollution from road vehicles.
3: Phone and Wifi microwave emission
4: Some Processed food
5: Household cleaning chemicals
6: Shampoos and deodorants
7: Lightning strikes
8: Strong wind/Tornado/Hurricane
9: Psychotic clowns with axes
10: One Direction music
256: Gamma radiation from VR screens.
Thalidomide was tested, and was thought to be safe to use:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...ine-15536544&usg=AOvVaw0lLg4s6F9xt4iR9VRWYXKC
Not to be using Thalidomide as an analogy, but it was tested, and certified to be safe ... whilst VR has never been tested, and never medically certified as safe, by any certified medical board ... It is only thought to be safe by medically uncertified PC techies, and complete novices, who have no medical degree what so ever