narrowgauge
92 year oldTrainz veteran
GaryP
You are referring to the Speedtrees I guess. Auran made an error and used existing tree KUIDs for the new Speedtrees so that routes loaded into TS2010 had 'foreign' trees appearing. I think that this error will be fixed. Speedtrees are animated to simulate wind movement and some consider that the degree of movement to be excessive. The list of items changed in the forthcoming SP2 show amongst other things, that tree movement will be controllable.
I didn't think to mention Speedtrees, I like them and the movement does not worry me, I have seen trees with more movement that they exhibit.
We are comparing TS2010 to TS2009. With TS2010, you get Speedtrees and can ignore them if you wish, with TS2009 you can never have them as the code was not built to use them. Both programs have a 'Replace Content' function which works very well, Speedtrees in the wrong position can be replaced quite easily.
Peter
So what your're saying is 2010 is ok, but what about the trees? I understand they replaced some of the routes with these growing trees that don't work right.
You are referring to the Speedtrees I guess. Auran made an error and used existing tree KUIDs for the new Speedtrees so that routes loaded into TS2010 had 'foreign' trees appearing. I think that this error will be fixed. Speedtrees are animated to simulate wind movement and some consider that the degree of movement to be excessive. The list of items changed in the forthcoming SP2 show amongst other things, that tree movement will be controllable.
I didn't think to mention Speedtrees, I like them and the movement does not worry me, I have seen trees with more movement that they exhibit.
We are comparing TS2010 to TS2009. With TS2010, you get Speedtrees and can ignore them if you wish, with TS2009 you can never have them as the code was not built to use them. Both programs have a 'Replace Content' function which works very well, Speedtrees in the wrong position can be replaced quite easily.
Peter