NSWGR_46Class
Just call my Captain Rude
Did I create the original in collaboration yes it was a team effort.
Did I do the new version in collaboration with the same team yes.
At the time of this all happening the guys in our modelling group felt it was very unfair that we were being forced to brake models that worked in older version of trainz by having to upgrade them to new version of trainz and thus forcing people to get new software. So as items were upgraded to the new standard they got new kuids so both models could coexist. When we were told we would be forced to up grade anyway, and given a list by N3V what items had to be fixed, as far as possible items were upgrade and in some case whole new versions released and old obsoleted. - some items that were beyond repair and a list was supplied to N3V were ask to be removed from the DLS there reply was no so we then had to obsoleted the rest. During this period some rat bag then was able to get some items via the community clean up and stuff them around - as all report to N3V at the time
Now the 36 that is on the the DLS now posing as the 36 is not the 36 that was the end version of 36 class in 2004 format.
This version had mesh errors that could not be fixed and this it was all pointed out to N3V and they were asked for it to be removed as we had created a better C36.
Persons unknown have dragged up and placed on the DLS with what they were stating as a fixed up mesh but was in fact an older version of the 36 mesh. The errors would give any NSW steam enthusiast a heart attach. This was all pointed out to N3V at the time it happened.
Look if N3V want to pass off old out dated work that is bad texture wrong colored and wrong shaped as there best and newest really who am I to stop them its there neck on the chopping block - the screen shost of the two should speak for themselves.
I do not want TANE to fail as I feel if it did it would almost be the down fall the N3V and the end of the trainz franchise. I want people to go whoa this is amazing.
How peeved off would you be if you paid for that TANE version of the 36 class and then find the far better and free version of it on the DLS.
One other note look - at the differences between the naming of the loco and the tender alone this should give you a clue that something is not right let alone the colour difference between the two.
But it looks like I am the only one who cares about this so if might as well just let it be as its not going to change anything.
Did I do the new version in collaboration with the same team yes.
At the time of this all happening the guys in our modelling group felt it was very unfair that we were being forced to brake models that worked in older version of trainz by having to upgrade them to new version of trainz and thus forcing people to get new software. So as items were upgraded to the new standard they got new kuids so both models could coexist. When we were told we would be forced to up grade anyway, and given a list by N3V what items had to be fixed, as far as possible items were upgrade and in some case whole new versions released and old obsoleted. - some items that were beyond repair and a list was supplied to N3V were ask to be removed from the DLS there reply was no so we then had to obsoleted the rest. During this period some rat bag then was able to get some items via the community clean up and stuff them around - as all report to N3V at the time
Now the 36 that is on the the DLS now posing as the 36 is not the 36 that was the end version of 36 class in 2004 format.
This version had mesh errors that could not be fixed and this it was all pointed out to N3V and they were asked for it to be removed as we had created a better C36.
Persons unknown have dragged up and placed on the DLS with what they were stating as a fixed up mesh but was in fact an older version of the 36 mesh. The errors would give any NSW steam enthusiast a heart attach. This was all pointed out to N3V at the time it happened.
Look if N3V want to pass off old out dated work that is bad texture wrong colored and wrong shaped as there best and newest really who am I to stop them its there neck on the chopping block - the screen shost of the two should speak for themselves.
I do not want TANE to fail as I feel if it did it would almost be the down fall the N3V and the end of the trainz franchise. I want people to go whoa this is amazing.
How peeved off would you be if you paid for that TANE version of the 36 class and then find the far better and free version of it on the DLS.
One other note look - at the differences between the naming of the loco and the tender alone this should give you a clue that something is not right let alone the colour difference between the two.
But it looks like I am the only one who cares about this so if might as well just let it be as its not going to change anything.
Last edited:
