Zero Emission Hydrogen Locomotive Pilot – West Sacramento

What is in the fuel cell? And what are the reactions that generate the hydrogen? The article seems to carefully avoid saying anything about those details.
 
Last edited:

Operational Similarities​

  • Same workload: It performs the same tasks—assembling/disassembling trains, moving cars short distances within yards or industrial spurs.
  • Same runtime: Operates for 8–12 hours per day, depending on yard activity, just like a diesel switcher.
  • Same flexibility: It can stop and refuel wherever needed, thanks to mobile hydrogen trailers—no fixed infrastructure required.
 
We can't just believe it's zero emissions unless we know how the energy is generated. It might be like calling a Tesla car "zero emissions" when its battery is charged with electricity from a fossil fuel power plant. In other words, BS.
Somewhere, directly or indirect, the hydrogen fuel is being produced then stored onsite or trucked over (that uses fossil fuels to bring it by truck) and it isn't going to be some solar plant doing it, I am pretty sure.
 
Hydrogen will never be viable as a fuel source until Green Hydrogen (generated by renewables) becomes commonplace. Hybrids will continue to be the #1 ecological option.
 
StatementVerdictWhy
Hydrogen needs green hydrogen to be viable✅ Mostly trueFossil-based hydrogen undermines its ecological value
Hybrids will remain the top ecological choice❌ Not true long-termEVs are cleaner and more sustainable as grids decarbonize
 
StatementVerdictWhy
Hydrogen needs green hydrogen to be viable✅ Mostly trueFossil-based hydrogen undermines its ecological value
Hybrids will remain the top ecological choice❌ Not true long-termEVs are cleaner and more sustainable as grids decarbonize

EVs are not that much cleaner, even long-term. Even with grid decarbonization you still have to mine tons of rare-earth metals in places where labor laws are slack and emissions regulations are an afterthought. Reminder that a good chunk of Lithium is mined in China and Zimbabwe, as well as extremely rare Neodymium and Praseodymium, which are also mostly mined in China. And there's no telling if China will decarbonize as the government says it will. Not to mention that with US politics being the way it is, coal is back up and renewables back down which kills the entire grid decarbonization thing, at least in the United States.

Also, EVs don't really work in heavy rail use cases. Locomotives need insane amounts of power to move tonnage, and batteries would just kill the range. I believe GE estimated 1-2 hours of continuous notch-8 running on their new FLXDrive locomotive. They work plenty fine for switching and smaller public transit systems though.

Diesel-electric locomotives are proven to only make up 1.9% of transportation-related emissions in the US, so there isn't much of a point to making zero-emission locomotives, especially with Tier 4 regulations. Emissions regulations should focus on motor vehicles and aircraft.
 
The real challenge is balancing local emissions reductions with global supply chain ethics, infrastructure readiness, and economic feasibility.
 
Back
Top