Ok, Thanks.... I am taking a "large scale " approach to get TR19 (the one on my system) back to basic functionality. Everything about TR19 looks good, and in fact better, to a degree. The exception, in my case, is AI. I am going to undergo a process to replace all of the signals with JR series products. Over time various signals have appeared in the route. They may have had logical violations or just plain bad coding. Or, perhaps they were misused. That will eliminate some, or maybe most of any issues I have with TR19.
I ran a 45 minute routing of a train through KickStarter2. I may have hit most of the switches in the route. NO problems using 96191. The seems to show that that build has no issues that these tests should have uncovered. A quick test on my very detailed route showed some track issues but the time was late so I'll hit those today.
Visually TR19 is an obvious improvement. I hope that my issues are only mine. Thanks for the info.
