Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One suggestion, see if you can increase your computer RAM from 34 to 64 Gig, just did mine n it help TrainzFinally after months of waiting the update for trainz 2022 (SP4) has been released to fix many of the bugs and other stuff that the previous update brought.
but the thing that has me confused is how there hasn't been a big push to fix the performance of trainz 2022.
in the videos below i will be using trainz 22 and trainz 19 to show the difference in performance using the same map, session and graphic settings. Also each session has around 20 AI trains running around doing simple task that i assigned them too.
Trainz 22 (using high graphic settings) can barely pass 60 fps and most of the time the fps is in the mid 40s. the biggest sin of it all is slow rendering of objects such as tracks and trees that require you to pause the game for everything to render in.
Trainz 19 (using high graphic settings) can achieve over 150 Fps and 200 Fps in certain cases. trainz 19 also renders everything way much faster when your moving around or switching locomotives.
Trainz 22 (44fps)
Trainz 19 (199 Fps)
graphical Settings that i used for both Trainz 22 and trainz 19 and my pc specs are 5600x 32 GB ram paired with a RTX 4070. the optimization for trainz truly suck.
But it is a combination of software and content. Each version of the program is optimised differently so it is quite possible the same content on two different versions of the program will perform differently.@JCitron
It’s the same route, same settings, same assets (good and bad), same computer but different programs. In other words, as fair a test as could be done. How can the performance difference not be attributed to the program? Users should reasonably expect the same or better performance from a newer program, not worse.
Thank you for the suggestion but i really doubt that would help since trainz 22 or 19 doesn't even come close to using 32gb of ram on my system. If this was microsoft flight simulator or dcs sure that 64 gb would do wonders but 32gb of ram is more than enough for trainz. since the beginning of August i have completely removed Trainz 22 from my system because of the performance issues it has been giving me and switched over to train simulator classic instead. It runs in 4k high settings with a smoove 60fps with no issues. The thing that is burning me is the amount of money i dropped in the trainz series but the issues is not worth the headache. I will download TRainz 22 once more and give it one more chance but deep down i already know what kind of performance i will get. In my personal opinion i feel like if the Performance Statistics actually did its job properly and showed what's really impacting performance it would make it way much easier to find the worst offender. Who knows, it could be bad script or asset with a high poly count or something else.One suggestion, see if you can increase your computer RAM from 34 to 64 Gig, just did mine n it help Trainz
Thank you for the suggestion but i really doubt that would help since trainz 22 or 19 doesn't even come close to using 32gb of ram on my system. If this was microsoft flight simulator or dcs sure that 64 gb would do wonders but 32gb of ram is more than enough for trainz. since the beginning of August i have completely removed Trainz 22 from my system because of the performance issues it has been giving me and switched over to train simulator classic instead. It runs in 4k high settings with a smoove 60fps with no issues. The thing that is burning me is the amount of money i dropped in the trainz series but the issues is not worth the headache. I will download TRainz 22 once more and give it one more chance but deep down i already know what kind of performance i will get. In my personal opinion i feel like if the Performance Statistics actually did its job properly and showed what's really impacting performance it would make it way much easier to find the worst offender. Who knows, it could be bad script or asset with a high poly count or something else.
So it would seem that it’s best to stick with 19 in that case, it’s cheaper and performs better.But it is a combination of software and content. Each version of the program is optimised differently so it is quite possible the same content on two different versions of the program will perform differently.
Cheerio John
But it is a combination of software and content. Each version of the program is optimised differently so it is quite possible the same content on two different versions of the program will perform differently.
Cheerio John
They do if you are using them on newer hardware. TRS19 performs the same or a bit worse on same hardware today. TS12 was always a crap performer but it performs a bit better, TS10 and TRS2009 are better performers than TS12, but are very limited.Regardless of how the bad performance occurs, a user should not need to know all the inner workings or the history. It’s on the Company to factor in everything, learning from past faults, cater for the changes they have insisted on and make their program perform better with each edition. Simple fact here is that the older program works better than the new one.
It depends if your CPU only has one core or more.They do if you are using them on newer hardware. TRS19 performs the same or a bit worse on same hardware today. TS12 was always a crap performer but it performs a bit better, TS10 and TRS2009 are better performers than TS12, but are very limited.
True. We get a lot of those hardware specs.It depends if your CPU only has one core or more.
Cheerio John