jregner1955
Member
The Omaha, Nebraska and Council Bluffs, Iowa Metropolitan area
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FOSTORIA, OHIO!!!
Which major American cities would you consider the "railroad capitals" of the nation?
When I say "railroad capitals" I suppose I mean cities that...
1) See a great deal of freight traffic
2) Have an extensive passenger rail network (commuter and/or rapid transit)
3) Have a rich railroad history...
With the criteria above, off the top of my head, I'd nominate...
- Boston, MA
Wow, you just made my day!Scranton, PA
Boston is still served freight-wise by Pan Am, and Norfolk Southern has plans to neter the freight market there. The MBTA has two major terminals, and there is a TON of railroad history around the area.
.Pan Am still runs freights into and through the greater Boston area. Not ran, not will run, is running. Also, NS is planning to work with Pan Am to run freights into Boston in the near future, so not only does it see freight traffic, but it will start to see even more soon.
.
Would you characterize this Boston freight traffic as "See a great deal of freight traffic" commensurate with a RR capitol as set forth in the OP?
The OP criteria was "See a great deal of freight traffic," not "saw." You would be hard pressed to trainspot freight in Boston now.
.
Would you characterize this Boston freight traffic as "See a great deal of freight traffic" commensurate with a RR capitol as set forth in the OP?
I would like to disqualify this post as it does not indicate any cities that are railroad capitals of the US. Jackson's post was at least interesting.
What is your problem?
I've yet to see anything constructive from you in this thread, all you've been doing is going around doing your usual pedantic "adjudication", fortuitously disqualifying others' posts.
Blutorse laid out some criteria, sure, but it wasn't said all must be fulfilled.
Hell, since the opening post already had Boston in it, would you like to disqualify this entire thread then?![]()
A follow-up question to an interesting post cannot be completely disinteresting. Jackson has current knowledge of the Pan Am / NS traffic on the north side of Boston, so I was asking him to find out if it is enough to qualify as "great deal of freight traffic" as was set forth in the OP. Since the termination of CSX operations between Framingham and Boston in their Boston Subdivision, and the closure of Beacon Park Yard, for about 2 years, Jackson's post made me open to the idea that Boston freight is in a state of flux rather than dropped of to near nothing, so my post was to gather knowledge from him.
I think you mean to ask what is my intent. When I saw misinformation cited, I gave facts that pertained to one town and one city for not meeting the criterion. This is a natural result of the rapid decline or reallocation of US rail traffic, a rapidity which may not allow all thread participants to keep abreast of current events.
My citations are factual. If you believe they are fortuitous and judicious, please go look up Amtrak and Fostoria and look up the CSX Boston Subdivision.
Keeping with facts is always constructive.
You are correct, it wasn't stated. However, if 3 criteria were mentioned in series without an "and" or "or," as in the OP, the default interpretation is with an "and," so yes all three would need to be satisfied to meet the OP.
LOL - If the interpretation were 1 or 2 or 3, we would be citing an unwieldy multitude of municipalities.
The thing I would like to disqualify is that attack, it has no provocation.
Regarding the attacks... This seems to be the way of the forums lately by a certain few people who deem it necessary to make things rotten for everyone else.
John
I agree wholeheartedly John. The attacks have to stop. They're driving us well behaved members off, or worse, they're turning the well behaved members into people that attack and are fed up with how things are.