If someone downloads software that is not obtained through legal channels and then this person was to upload a route to Auran containing that said software , couldn't Auran see that these items are payware and if Auran had a database of all registered payware wouldn't these people be caught ?
Not without, as you say, a database of all payware, and there's a lot of paranoid payware authors out there that I can't see submitting their payware to auran to be able to check against...
As it is, it's much better to just rely on the eyes of a few tends of thousand users to recognise when something untoward is going on, and report it. Which is the system we have today.
Question 2
If someone uploads to Auran doesn't Auran then have ownership of that item as part of the agreement to upload,therefor the product or said item becomes the property of Auran.
Nope, you grant them a non-exclusive agreement to allow them to distribute your work, but it's still your work, you still own it.
Question 3
If i was to release software of any kind and sold it to the public and the software was faulty in some way but it still worked but not in the correct manner , wouldn't i still legaly have to repair or refund money.
And over what time frame would i have to make good of the product i have sold.
regards steve
Generally, no, there are little legal requirements for handling faulty software.
Europe and Australia both have 'fit for use' laws which mean that the software must at least vaguely work - that is, that it is what it says, in the case of trainz - 'a train simulator'. But they are under no legal obligation to provide a bug free piece of software, nor are they legally required to provide free updates or bug fixes, except if the software is utterly unusable. Warranty laws around the world will generally provide a basic guarantee that the software will at least run, if not then you're probably entitled to your money back. In Europe and Australia this has a limit of at least 12 months. In the US warranties are only valid for 30 days by default.
If they were under such legal obligations the software industry would collapse within days, NO software is bug free, NASA spends a ridiculous fortune to develop 'nearly bug free' software, but there are still bugs, and they learn how to work around them.
Software is an inherently different type of product to any other thing mankind has ever produced - people often like to argue that if bridges were developed by software developers people would die left and right, but the fact is that bridges are built in a much more static environment, software has the equivalent of each person that crosses the bridge causing the banks of the river and the river currents to be completely different each time.