Ya know - Sparky15 has a point there.
I've been reading MR since the late 50's and I can't ever remember seeing a bad review. Some items got slight mentions for not conforming to one or the other RP's (recommended practices) or some very minor discrepancy in being true to the prototype but I can't ever remember a review saying this or that is a hunk of junk - don't buy it.
That's something they dare not do even if the product is a hunk of junk. No advertiser would want their product reviewed and to be on the safe side would probably pull their advertising.
Ben
I've been reading MR since the late 50's and I can't ever remember seeing a bad review. Some items got slight mentions for not conforming to one or the other RP's (recommended practices) or some very minor discrepancy in being true to the prototype but I can't ever remember a review saying this or that is a hunk of junk - don't buy it.
That's something they dare not do even if the product is a hunk of junk. No advertiser would want their product reviewed and to be on the safe side would probably pull their advertising.
Ben