
:hehe:
I do respect "flyable" aircraft models in Trainz very much. Of late Craig is showing us the next-to-come "flyable" wonders by our friend Ian (aka) Vulcan the master. See -->
http://forums.auran.com/trainz/showthread.php?t=50753 . Really awesome worthhaving models! :clap:
But... I (we all) do also know the limitations of Trainz as a model flying tool. I have sometimes labelled Trainz as Total Transportation Simulator since every kind of ways of carrying people and things can be represented but it can't be good at every aspect of taking things from a place to another.
There are many static elements in Trainz and maybe they should be kept being static so as not to endanger trainz operation performance.
That's why I've never intended my trainzy model aircraft to be "flyable.driveable.trackable"
As Craig says, I think they look reasonably good idling-hanging over on some routes related to airfields or simply a distant bird in the beautiful trainzy skies we all can enjoy.
I admit that in comparison to specific Flight Simulators models, mine lack the detail and fine appearance they should -which I always try to hide focusing in fine texturing-, but Flight Simulators lack many other things we enjoy within Trainz every day. Flight Simulators can result in boring me, Trainz seems not to achieve that :hehe: after an eight-year trainzy career.
:hehe: BTW, I don't know why one of my Spanish Air Force F-18 is included built-in in TS2010 if nobody seems to be using it on the new routes offered there. Was it a mysterious mistake?
The flyover side of Alberte