End of Support for Anything below TS12

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ah, so you're acknowledging what I asked about 8 pages ago: That this is a planned, punitive, perhaps even vindictive obsolescence of otherwise technically fine, error-free content.
You can still make content for any version of Trainz you like and host it, rather like TPR. What you can't do is use N3V resource to host new content for unsupported product. Does that really sound so unreasonable to you?
 
If Adobe believe this to be a good marketing move, what's the chance of N3V doing the same for TS2010 ? (I think we all know the answer to that one)

It would make for a great introduction to Trainz for casual gamers or the younger demographic who may not have the means to purchase games yet. Think of it as a fully featured demo. I doubt N3V is bagging anything at all in 06 sales these days, so they have everything to gain and nothing to lose.

Of course, this is a totally separate discussion best picked up in a new thread.

Cheerio,
Nicholas
 
If Adobe believe this to be a good marketing move, what's the chance of N3V doing the same for TS2010 ? (I think we all know the answer to that one)
Using Adobe as an example was probably a bad choice. All indications are that this was a cockup by Adobe and nothing to do with Marketing, fairly obvious it's gone too far to block none licensed people getting hold of it or for that matter certain software sites.

https://forums.adobe.com/message/4980033 See if anyone can make any sense out of this? Adobe seem to be avoiding giving a clear answer. Meanwhile half the Planet has got hold of all of CS2, not just Photoshop!

Best answer you can get from Adobe is this:
Effective December 13, Adobe disabled the activation server for CS2 products and Acrobat 7 because of a technical glitch. These products were released over 7 years ago and do not run on many modern operating systems. But to ensure that any customers activating those old versions can continue to use their software, we issued a serial number directly to those customers. While this might be interpreted as Adobe giving away software for free, we did it to help our customers.

Back on topic, TS2010 is probably too recent to give away as a freebie and extremely unlikely to happen but you never know, maybe in a couple of years time. Do it now and you alienate people who have maybe only bought 2010 recently.

Nothing wrong with using old versions of software however the support / old version assets issue has already be done to death on here, do we really need to keep going over old ground knowing full well nothing is going to change?
 
do we really need to keep going over old ground knowing full well nothing is going to change?
No we don't need to, but it will probably happen anyway.

It seems some have mistaken 'land of the free' to mean 'land of the free eternal support' ;)
 
Last edited:
You can still make content for any version of Trainz you like and host it, rather like TPR. What you can't do is use N3V resource to host new content for unsupported product. Does that really sound so unreasonable to you?

You'd know the answer if you'd been paying attention at all.

I don't like being lied to, especially when the reasons given are such obvious bullcrud, anyone with any technical background can see through them and pick them apart. I'm pretty sure most people don't like being lied to any more than I do.

It was interesting, though, to see the fanboys circle the wagons as they usually do and repeat claims which few if any of them probably even understood, let alone knew about the flaws in them. I suppose it makes for an productive social experiment.
 
Last edited:
Let me just remind everybody that, even though RW is a franchise too, they offer free updates to the next version for existing customers, and they make most of their money from DLC for most of their recent versions instead of forcing people to update.
 
Actually, IIRC, you are forced to upgrade unless you disconnect your game files from Steam to prevent any remote manipulation by them. True it keeps everyone on the same page and makes versioning simpler but at the expense of forced conformity. No thanks.
 
Steam doesn't force an upgrade, you can choose not to, as you can still start the game up with an old version and run said version.
 
"Forced Conformity" doesn't sound too different than what's going on with Trainz; indeed, many here have argued for just that.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry if this is the sort of post that's prone to repeat itself, but I have question and this seems the place to ask it (I could be mistaken!). Will N3V still allow us to upload updates to existing TS10 content with build numbers lower than TS12?
 
I'm sorry if this is the sort of post that's prone to repeat itself, but I have question and this seems the place to ask it (I could be mistaken!). Will N3V still allow us to upload updates to existing TS10 content with build numbers lower than TS12?

No, nothing with a trainz build lower than 3.5 will be accepted, period.
 
I bought TS2013 and i wasn't forced to upgrade. I am still running it, in fact, and no, it isn't TS2014, it is TS2013, so no, you aren't forced to upgrade.
 
Let me just remind everybody that, even though RW is a franchise too, they offer free updates to the next version for existing customers, and they make most of their money from DLC for most of their recent versions instead of forcing people to update.

To add balance they don't provide a forum, nor do they provide a DLS equivalent.
 
I can understand no longer providing actual technical support for older versions, but in respect of people wishing to update their existing work in TS2010 etc. (maybe to correct an error caused by bugs in N3V's software, such as a detached spline by interactive object) should they be forced to convert their work to the latest supported version i.e. TS12? People who use TS2010 and earlier versions are still customers in respect of purchasing FCT's to access the DLS and surely are deserving of obtaining updated versions of earlier work? In many cases, older routes etc. will not work in TS12 due to N3V's dumping of compatibility mode (though ambiguously they potentially hamstrung TANE by insisting on including this, instead of ditching "old" Trainz altogether).

You don't see TS.com or UKTS dumping routes that were created 3 - 4 years ago for MSTS or RW, or declining updated versions of these.

And don't forget folks, all you good people beavering away building in TS12 (myself included) will in a year or two's time find our work regarded as that of "former customers" (a phrase N3V have coined in the past to slam the door on legacy versions) as indeed in due course will the first iteration of T:ANE.

With regard to no DLS for RW, true, but there is Steam Workshop where freeware stuff can be uploaded (as opposed to Marketplace which is micro-payware). Not on the same scale or scope as the DLS, of course.
 
Last edited:
TS12 isn't the only PC version that N3V will be supporting after this September. Both Mac Trainz and Mac Trainz 2 will also be supported.
Whoopee! What's that two users per 10,000 computer owners? My best man and late best friend was a MAC freak and programmer and had to keep employment writing software for Windows apps. They were a great machine when the competition was Windows 3.1, way better through Windows 95, but have been losing ground since Windows 98 in the head to head capabilities tests. Without a large population to pay out the premo bucks they want as a composer or artist would, they only have the monied crowd and spoiled brats with parents with deep pockets as a customer base because they have a COOL rep. The average consumer has to watch his pennies a bit more wisely.

But I understand Windwalkr is a MAC freak as well... so we have TS09/MAC-1 and TS12/MAC-2, more or less. I'd have rather seen TS12-SP2 and let R&D and development funds be spent on the main market products, not the niche market. Of course, they did the whole thing on the iPad and other tablets, and writing in OSx wold have helped that. // F

No go ahead, I'm interested :hehe: It's nice to know what conspiracy mongering idiots on the internet really think they know about me
No need to snoop like that. Your track record here, obvious relative youthfulness, and generally sour answers, like Nick's unwillingness to let things go without the last word, give us pretty much all we need to know. What we say about you and a few others off the forum is something you should contemplate and regret. But I expect most of us were nearly as cocky when we were twenty-something, just more pleasant about it. // F

It would make for a great introduction to Trainz for casual gamers or the younger demographic who may not have the means to purchase games yet. Think of it as a fully featured demo. I doubt N3V is bagging anything at all in 06 sales these days, so they have everything to gain and nothing to lose. Of course, this is a totally separate discussion best picked up in a new thread. Cheerio, Nicholas
I've often thought they were foolish to not trade on the stability of the product and keep selling the older versions as starter or add ons. TRS2006 at $7.50, the TC's at $12, TS09 at $20... and so forth. Hold the TRS on the low end and let the content within be the value. Taking JAs up has some attraction--though I never have gotten back around to finding out why TS12 won't accept my TS09 JAs.

I don't like being lied to, especially when the reasons given are such obvious bullcrud, anyone with any technical background can see through them and pick them apart. I'm pretty sure most people don't like being lied to any more than I do.
Yeah, that sticks in my craw too. But the failure to set and promulgate promised features and changes in the data models and scripting capabilities far enough in advance--so the CC's can be working out how to use it, bugs me a bit more. All the proper communication needs seem to only rarely be on their radar so we hear months later from Windwakr or Moody this or that was addressed in such and such and upgrade. Or someone gripes about it again and Zec comes up and posts the news a bug is gone now.

All PR is spin, is lies at one level, and this company certainly has the marketing 'Flash' down. I guess in effect that makes me desensitized to their subterfuge here. To me, the trainz-build is linked to compatibility and capability and so is a tech-level minimum. But that's not how they use, at least not lately. HF4 was different enough, esp. the scripting mileau-- they should have bumped to V3.8 and didn't. // F

It was interesting, though, to see the fanboys circle the wagons as they usually do and repeat claims which few if any of them probably even understood, let alone knew about the flaws in them. I suppose it makes for an productive social experiment.
I never agreed to be part of any experiments... put THAT scalpel away Dr. Mengele! Not sure there are all that many fan boys. Nick seems to be representing an army all by himself. A number of early posters just accept it, as do most readers. amigacooke, despite all the posts is quite a bit more mature I think. Face it RRSig, the younger generation thinks anything 3 years old is old fashioned and looks at things in a very throw-away way. I see it and get it from my two boys every week in some way. Whereas our generation grew up with things that lasted for decades--and were expected to. Someone above remarked they wouldn't keep a computer five years old, and I wouldn't get rid of one so long as it has something I want to run. That may be a teensy, tiny factor in why there are eleven of them in this house, but maybe these guys never played Privateer or other classics like Master of Orion, the Civs, etc. Ever try to run some of those on the new machines? (SimCity 3000 for example--the screen is so squirrelly you have trouble placing roads or pipes, etc.) // F

Let me just remind everybody that, even though RW is a franchise too, they offer free updates to the next version for existing customers, and they make most of their money from DLC for most of their recent versions instead of forcing people to update.
Another biz model entirely. Let's see how long they last this time. Didn't that game engine have MSTS as a grandparent? // F

Actually, IIRC, you are forced to upgrade unless you disconnect your game files from Steam to prevent any remote manipulation by them. True it keeps everyone on the same page and makes versioning simpler but at the expense of forced conformity. No thanks.
Preaching to my choir!
From what I can see, that kind of action ... Might be like N3V updating their railcar artwork under kuid:-25 and obsoleting the one's that actually look aged. Harrumph! Never seems to have occurred to them having and providing both meant they could show off their new graphic tricks and give people an appearance choice at the one and same time. Would have been darn nice to see the THEM actually use their own KUID system and issued new trucks on KUID2 upgrades. Mixing an occasional new from the factory boxcar makes realistic sense. Having a consist looking like it's just been lettered after being painted is a bit unrealistic. Give me some dirt and grime boys! These cars work for an living, not sit around sipping Margaritas at the pool! // F

Not necessarily. As a (regretful) TS2012 purchaser, as soon as TS10 exploded on me, i needed a replacement until i got TS12. I was forced to update to TS2014.
HUH!?? Did you feed it too many KUID cookies or get hit by a mini-black hole? // F

I bought TS2013 and i wasn't forced to upgrade. I am still running it, in fact, and no, it isn't TS2014, it is TS2013, so no, you aren't forced to upgrade.
Ah, a confession of another alienated soul giving in to temptation and allowing himself some time crossing over the tracks to the dark side of life! I'd thought better of you mate. Next thing you'll be ranting and kicking your feet like LWVRR ... but go ahead, I always enjoy a spectacle <BSEG> // Frank
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top