End of Support for Anything below TS12

Status
Not open for further replies.
You don't see TS.com or UKTS dumping routes that were created 3 - 4 years ago for MSTS or RW, or declining updated versions of these.
These are not commercial organisations who have to turn a profit to provide income for the employees and for future development.
 
For those who have lost track, or simply lost the link, here are the relevant details copied straight from the Trainz wiki (content creation pages) at http://online.ts2009.com/mediaWiki/index.php/Trainz_Life-Cycle_Policy

SNIP one table

It has been there for all to see since who knows when.

As you can see, there are a number of expirations due next month.
KUDOS Pware! And to Oknotse for the next post translating the facts to the sick, lame, or too lazy to read! All to many around here forget to look at the TrainzOnline wiki, let me point out a couple of links others should bookmark:


  1. The CCG or Content Creator's Guide (CCGTC pages) -- are the only N3V era text base resource which takes a stab and teaching the fundamentals of the Trainz Data Model in some kind of reasonable continuity. It is a must read for anyone trying to learn to make content, and for repairing older stuff. The TrainzOnline Wiki is the current authority and has the last word for any technical differences between the two, but is stupidly lacking back history or mentions of how to transition data and links poorly to much of anything. (Don't blame me. I was doing my part. Trivia: Tony Hilliam seems these days to be the most frequent editor. At least he writes clearly.)
  2. The Wiki Special Pages -- For example, most linked to pages and most linked to categories -- the later shows a whooping big nine member pages in the category Config tag -- The TBS seems under represented by exposition. However, various search page links "All pages with prefix", Well these will give you the idea.
  3. Maintenance reports

    [TABLE="class: mw-specialpages-table, width: 100%"]
    [TR]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
    Recent changes and logs

    [TABLE="class: mw-specialpages-table, width: 100%"]
    [TR]
    [TD] [/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
    The key point is there are links for all sorts of information, including new pages and page changes so one can check now and again what has been updated or happening. If a particular type of report is of interest, you can set up and RSS feed notification and get an update if and when pages of interest are modified. So if you script, create content, or contribute edits, you can see what happens. The special pages are linked in the Mediawiki skins as either a header or sidebar, but always there.


To add balance they don't provide a forum, nor do they provide a DLS equivalent.
That would rather shoot their own business model in the foot. Their revenue stream according to the above is DLC/DRM fueled.

I can understand no longer providing actual technical support for older versions, but in respect of people wishing to update their existing work in TS2010 etc. (maybe to correct an error caused by bugs in N3V's software, such as a detached spline by interactive object) should they be forced to convert their work to the latest supported version i.e. TS12? People who use TS2010 and earlier versions are still customers in respect of purchasing FCT's to access the DLS and surely are deserving of obtaining updated versions of earlier work? In many cases, older routes etc. will not work in TS12 due to N3V's dumping of compatibility mode (though ambiguously they potentially hamstrung TANE by insisting on including this, instead of ditching "old" Trainz altogether).
Oh, WELL PUT! Dumping the customers is exactly the way to get a customer to dump you. They have the same mindset as H222, Nick and such that 3-5 years is a long time. I say, we buy the product and put up with N3V sometimes 'they did what' actions because we expect that free content library to keep on growing--for any and all versions. // F
You don't see TS.com or UKTS dumping routes that were created 3 - 4 years ago for MSTS or RW, or declining updated versions of these.

And don't forget folks, all you good people beavering away building in TS12 (myself included) will in a year or two's time find our work regarded as that of "former customers" (a phrase N3V have coined in the past to slam the door on legacy versions) as indeed in due course will the first iteration of T:ANE.
I hadn't heard TS12 was having import issues with routes from older versions. I had one ear in some TS12+SP1 thread last summer and fall but it got awful long to pay a lot of attention to, while I hadn't yet opened the box! If I work two years of my free time then can't share it, well--it's another strong indication these guys don't use their own product like we route builders do. It's disgusting. // F
With regard to no DLS for RW, true, but there is Steam Workshop where freeware stuff can be uploaded (as opposed to Marketplace which is micro-payware). Not on the same scale or scope as the DLS, of course.
I'd hope to think TPR or a consortium of other long established hosting sites will be taking a hard look at recruiting CC's to put their 'obsolete by fiat routes and sessions there instead. I'm already having trouble finding kuids I downloaded last winter, disabled them (TS12 didn't like something) then deleted them figuring to clean the house then add HF4. Did you know you can't download or import a cdp if the asset is disabled and deleted? A PITA! Fortunately I've found most were cross-imported from TS09 or TS10 directories. Turns out you can re-import them if disabled... but wonder if I deleted them, why they would be disabled in assets.tdx (instead of just being 'disappeared'). The implication is that the asset once it's in the index, stays in the index. // Frank
 
By "I am still running it," I meant it is still that version. The only reason I bought it is for the HSC route which I need track arrangements for. The actual sim superficially looks nice, but looks can be deceiving. That is what I m scared of with TANE. Trainz is undoubtably the best sim out there. It combines looks with an easy learning curve, decent fps on most computers, and great functionality. To see that go away would be awful, but I fear that we are already losing our grasp. First with DRM and now this. I only brought up Railworks to bring up a point about the competitor that provides another option, albeit maybe a bad one, but another point. In doing so, I have opened up a whole new can of worms which I see a bit more clearly now. N3V is trying to do what Railworks is doing, but more discreetly: slowly dropping older versions at an increasing rate until the next sim comes out. It's sad to see, but it is the harsh reality.
No matter what Tony Hillam or any of the fanboys say, this is a bad direction for Trainz. Very bad.
 
ok, since I cant find the energy to read an entire text book of posts, can somebody tell me why exactly you're all getting mad about this change when its been known to happen before? Or so I'm assuming..
 
Last edited:
Hi Vern.

1. When you buy an FCT (with an older Trainz version), you pay for access to the DLS, that is all. When I bring my '93 Golf to the workshop I pay to get my motor serviced, but I don't expect an updated Bluemotion TDI engine as well, same thing.

2. MSTS is now self-sufficient, lives on without a corporate entity responsible for it (at present) and as such shouldn't be compared to Trainz.

3. I bought TS12 two years ago for A$35. I think come 2016 I'd be happy to buy a newer product - on condition that N3V doesn't screw up. This "door slamming" that you speak of? It's called end-of-life, which I believe has already been explained a dozen times in this thread.
 
Essentially, N3V has chosen to drop perfectly good versions and block uploads and downloads to the DLS, including updates for all of the users currently on those versions. This is somewhat of a scary move seeing as they are choosing to drop TS12 in two years as well. We aren't angry about the drop in support, we are angry about the blocking of uploads and downloads.
 
Essentially, N3V has chosen to drop perfectly good versions and block uploads and downloads to the DLS, including updates for all of the users currently on those versions. This is somewhat of a scary move seeing as they are choosing to drop TS12 in two years as well. We aren't angry about the drop in support, we are angry about the blocking of uploads and downloads.

Correction: Nobody is blocking downloads - whatever <TB 2.9 assets already on the DLS can still be downloaded.

Continuing to allow old-version uploads is by extension continued support of these old-versions. It's like if your car of model X is has ceased production a few years ago and now they're going to stop manufacturing spare parts for model X, are you going to go after them with torches and pitchforks?
 
I never agreed to be part of any experiments... put THAT scalpel away Dr. Mengele! Not sure there are all that many fan boys. Nick seems to be representing an army all by himself. A number of early posters just accept it, as do most readers. amigacooke, despite all the posts is quite a bit more mature I think. Face it RRSig, the younger generation thinks anything 3 years old is old fashioned and looks at things in a very throw-away way. I see it and get it from my two boys every week in some way. Whereas our generation grew up with things that lasted for decades--and were expected to. Someone above remarked they wouldn't keep a computer five years old, and I wouldn't get rid of one so long as it has something I want to run. That may be a teensy, tiny factor in why there are eleven of them in this house, but maybe these guys never played Privateer or other classics like Master of Orion, the Civs, etc. Ever try to run some of those on the new machines? (SimCity 3000 for example--the screen is so squirrelly you have trouble placing roads or pipes, etc.) // F

Interesting point, and one that has been rather bothersome as an overall social problem. It rather ironic that people and especially companies are stepping all over each other to pretend to be so "green", but today they are so damn engrossed in consumerism and materialism that they make those from the 70s and 80s look like a bunch of tree-hugging hippies. They just need to buy, buy, BUY. Especially when it comes to technology.

Oh, it's more important than ever to be SEEN with the most current gadget. Ever notice iPhone cases almost always have a cut out around the apple in the back? Why have an iPhone if people can't SEE that you have an iPhone?

But, on another level, I find the whole thing funny, too.
 
Last edited:
Look up hyperbole in the dictionary. Should I spell it for you or EXPLAIN IT with small words and big pictures? DBASA! // Frank
You can try, but if you're prone to excessive exaggeration for effect I'm going to lose interest very quickly. It tends to be used by those who have shaky arguments and therefore have to try to bully people into line.
 
Correction: Nobody is blocking downloads - whatever <TB 2.9 assets already on the DLS can still be downloaded.

Continuing to allow old-version uploads is by extension continued support of these old-versions. It's like if your car of model X is has ceased production a few years ago and now they're going to stop manufacturing spare parts for model X, are you going to go after them with torches and pitchforks?

Ok, so, going along with your comparison, let's extend the service life of software to 20 years or so, when parts might actually start to get scarce. And, just in case you're going to throw out the argument that technology advances faster than cars, I generally have no trouble getting parts for my Apple ][+ or my arcade machines.
 
ok, since I cant find the energy to read an entire text book of posts, can somebody tell me why exactly you're all getting mad about this change when its been known to happen before? Or so I'm assuming..
Like many threads it's a rehash of old arguments (from both sides) which has the sole purpose of keeping its combatants entertained.
 
But I understand Windwalkr is a MAC freak as well... so we have TS09/MAC-1 and TS12/MAC-2, more or less.

No need to snoop like that. Your track record here, obvious relative youthfulness, and generally sour answers, like Nick's unwillingness to let things go without the last word, give us pretty much all we need to know. What we say about you and a few others off the forum is something you should contemplate and regret. But I expect most of us were nearly as cocky when we were twenty-something, just more pleasant about it.

You can have the last word when you calm down, stop insisting N3V and its products are a giant conspiracy and/or continue to write off topic novellas. I have spelt it out as clear as daylight what this TB 3.5> decision is about and even your good pal RRSignal agrees.

Looking down on anyone younger than you, expecting people to regret over your opinion of them and calling people who purchase a product of their liking "freaks"? That's a textbook example of cocky, Frank. Lead by example.

Next thing you'll be ranting and kicking your feet like LWVRR ... but go ahead, I always enjoy a spectacle <BSEG> // Frank

Pardon me for being direct but if I may say so, you're being quite the spectacle too.

we expect that free content library to keep on growing--for any and all versions.

The content library aka DLS is not free to operate. If you would like to take over the responsibility of keeping it running I'm sure N3V would be happy to offload that cost to you.

If I work two years of my free time then can't share it, well--it's another strong indication these guys don't use their own product like we route builders do.

Say Frank, since we're playing the "you haven't done anything so shut up" game, can you show us please where are these lovely routes of yours that you spent two years making?

I'd hope to think TPR or a consortium of other long established hosting sites will be taking a hard look at recruiting CC's to put their 'obsolete by fiat routes and sessions there instead.

Great idea. Please continue to post things like this instead of off-topic walls of texts about stuff like your wiki, your wiki-writing skills, N3V's wiki or your debarment from N3V's wiki.
 
Ok, so, going along with your comparison, let's extend the service life of software to 20 years or so, when parts might actually start to get scarce. And, just in case you're going to throw out the argument that technology advances faster than cars, I generally have no trouble getting parts for my Apple ][+ or my arcade machines.

No sir, the point was not the duration of support offered, but the concept of what support entails. In this particular example, just like you wouldn't expect a manufacturer to continue supplying spare parts for unsupported models, you wouldn't expect a software company to continue supplying outdated content for unsupported versions.

And before anyone brings up the "but they work perfectly fine!" argument for the umpteenth time, no, this has nothing to do with how they still work otherwise we can argue, "but N3V, TB 1.3 assets still work, why are you not supporting Trainz SP3?"

Yea, you can still find parts for your Apple II, but I'll bet a dollar you didn't buy those parts from Apple themselves.
 
Last edited:
No sir, the point was not the duration of support offered, but the concept of what support entails. In this particular example, just like you wouldn't expect a manufacturer to continue supplying spare parts for unsupported models

Yea, you can still find parts for your Apple II, but I'll bet a dollar you didn't buy those parts from Apple themselves.

My car was made in 2002, but 12 years later, well after they finished making it, 9 years after the warranty expired, after 2 later versions have been released, I can still go to the manufacturers agent & buy geniuine replacement parts. ;)
 
My car was made in 2002, but 12 years later, well after they finished making it, 9 years after the warranty expired, after 2 later versions have been released, I can still go to the manufacturers agent & buy geniuine replacement parts. ;)

How many hundreds of thousands (or millions) of your particular 2002 model were made and sold? ...and how much do you pay for your genuine spare parts? My point is that the manufacturer of your 2002 model car is still probably making a tidy profit out of spare parts sales. Indeed, it probably has an entire spare parts division.

How much money is N3V making from the DLS downloads of assets it maintains for older versions of Trainz? That DLS support costs money (servers, hosting, backups, bandwidth, helpdesk, etc) and I somehow doubt that what you pay for an FCT will cover all of that.
 
Not in Australia - Ford here now only carry spares and offer support via a dealer for 10 years now. Needed a heater element for my 2003 build van and was laughed at by the dealer - it was down to either get one from wrecker or get a custom build from a radiator manufacture. Ford would not fit it either.

My car was made in 2002, but 12 years later, well after they finished making it, 9 years after the warranty expired, after 2 later versions have been released, I can still go to the manufacturers agent & buy geniuine replacement parts. ;)
 
Last edited:
I don't know if anybody posted that... If you have Trainz Mac 2 and you download a DLS asset which was crafted before the 'icon.tga vs icon.texture'* filter was placed there you will end up wit a faulty asset in your collection. This is mad.

-----
*
if config contains such tag: icon.tga while there is a file in the folder called icon.texture.txt the DLS uploiad filter will not pass such asset due to double linking (or so called) to the icon.tga file itself.
 
No sir, the point was not the duration of support offered, but the concept of what support entails. In this particular example, just like you wouldn't expect a manufacturer to continue supplying spare parts for unsupported models, you wouldn't expect a software company to continue supplying outdated content for unsupported versions.

And before anyone brings up the "but they work perfectly fine!" argument for the umpteenth time, no, this has nothing to do with how they still work otherwise we can argue, "but N3V, TB 1.3 assets still work, why are you not supporting Trainz SP3?"

Yea, you can still find parts for your Apple II, but I'll bet a dollar you didn't buy those parts from Apple themselves.

Sure the duration matters. We ARE comparing technology to cars, here...

As for the Apple parts, Apple made almost none of them. In many cases, I'm buying the exact same part from the exact same manufacturer Apple did 33 years ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top