B boc61 New member Jun 23, 2013 #1 I'm missing one item for this, <kuid:2:60238> It's evidently by Vulcan, but I can't seem to find it. Shouldn't there be more numbers as this is just the user ID?
I'm missing one item for this, <kuid:2:60238> It's evidently by Vulcan, but I can't seem to find it. Shouldn't there be more numbers as this is just the user ID?
S shaneturner12 Tutorial Creator Jun 23, 2013 #2 Looking at the KUID, the User ID appears to be 2, which would be a N3V one. Shane
B boc61 New member Jun 23, 2013 #3 shaneturner12 said: Looking at the KUID, the User ID appears to be 2, which would be a N3V one. Shane Click to expand... Maybe, but all searches keep pointing to Vulcan as those numbers make up his user ID. I'm confused.
shaneturner12 said: Looking at the KUID, the User ID appears to be 2, which would be a N3V one. Shane Click to expand... Maybe, but all searches keep pointing to Vulcan as those numbers make up his user ID. I'm confused.
S shaneturner12 Tutorial Creator Jun 23, 2013 #4 That's interesting. Can I check if it's a KUID or KUID2 you're dealing with there? Shane
B boc61 New member Jun 23, 2013 #5 shaneturner12 said: That's interesting. Can I check if it's a KUID or KUID2 you're dealing with there? Shane Click to expand... Oh wait. I just noticed where the colon is placed, I guess you are right. It is a KUID. Still can't seem to find it anywhere. Maybe Mr Dorsey will see this and be able to solve the mystery
shaneturner12 said: That's interesting. Can I check if it's a KUID or KUID2 you're dealing with there? Shane Click to expand... Oh wait. I just noticed where the colon is placed, I guess you are right. It is a KUID. Still can't seem to find it anywhere. Maybe Mr Dorsey will see this and be able to solve the mystery
S shaneturner12 Tutorial Creator Jun 23, 2013 #6 Hopefully, as it's an unusual user ID. If it was negative, I'd expect it to be either built-in or an ex built-in asset. Shane
Hopefully, as it's an unusual user ID. If it was negative, I'd expect it to be either built-in or an ex built-in asset. Shane
B bendorsey Bridge-n-trestle builder Jun 23, 2013 #7 There are two. Both are invisible tracks for boats that have been setup as locos running on them in the water.. kuid2:60238:37037:1 kuid2:60237:37038:1 Ben
There are two. Both are invisible tracks for boats that have been setup as locos running on them in the water.. kuid2:60238:37037:1 kuid2:60237:37038:1 Ben
B boc61 New member Jun 23, 2013 #8 bendorsey said: There are two. Both are invisible tracks for boats that have been setup as locos running on them in the water.. kuid2:60238:37037:1 kuid2:60237:37038:1 Ben Click to expand... I have both of those but CM shows kuid2:60238 as missing. It's in the kuid table. Can I delete it?
bendorsey said: There are two. Both are invisible tracks for boats that have been setup as locos running on them in the water.. kuid2:60238:37037:1 kuid2:60237:37038:1 Ben Click to expand... I have both of those but CM shows kuid2:60238 as missing. It's in the kuid table. Can I delete it?
S stagecoach 75377 Jun 23, 2013 #9 Yes or change it to the correct kuid number. The kuid table is only for the CMP search for dependencies and does not effect the asset..
Yes or change it to the correct kuid number. The kuid table is only for the CMP search for dependencies and does not effect the asset..
B bendorsey Bridge-n-trestle builder Jun 23, 2013 #10 Or substitute a different invisible track. I used those two because they are different colors and at different elevations. Ben
Or substitute a different invisible track. I used those two because they are different colors and at different elevations. Ben
P p-dehnert Well-known member Jun 23, 2013 #11 The line (3) in the kuid-table is just some garbage. Delete the entry, and renumber the following line. Peter
The line (3) in the kuid-table is just some garbage. Delete the entry, and renumber the following line. Peter
B boc61 New member Jun 23, 2013 #12 p-dehnert said: The line (3) in the kuid-table is just some garbage. Delete the entry, and renumber the following line. Peter Click to expand... Thank you.
p-dehnert said: The line (3) in the kuid-table is just some garbage. Delete the entry, and renumber the following line. Peter Click to expand... Thank you.
B bendorsey Bridge-n-trestle builder Jun 23, 2013 #13 I screwed up (again). One of these eons I'll learn how to type. Both should be 60238. I just checked and they are on the DLS tho you might want to check all the earlier versions of trainz when you do the search. Profuse apologies. Ben
I screwed up (again). One of these eons I'll learn how to type. Both should be 60238. I just checked and they are on the DLS tho you might want to check all the earlier versions of trainz when you do the search. Profuse apologies. Ben
