Rail Pilgrim, I am not sure how to approach that. As I say, the asset is actually fine. If you take it as is, the letters are correct, but the door is on the left side. But it has been applied to the building front backwards, so that the door is on the right side, which reverses the lettering. You could just turn the asset around, and the letters would be fine, with the door in the middle of the building. My assumption here is that when Vincentrh went to layout the route, he wanted the door on the right and did not much care if the letters were readable. What I did was fix the asset for this route, by reversing the lettering, but now it is not really correct for anything else. Confusing, I know.
Kotangagirl, LOL Ann! I may have had to fix my grammar there, that's a great catch on the language! I was really thinking of a friend of mine who is a Pima Native American. He was working on his house, and we were discussing how we decide if things are "good enough". My saying is usually that a project is good enough for who it's for (me). He says his house has to pass the "Galloping Horse Test". If it looks good galloping by on a horse, then it's OK. But I don't think he meant the house was galloping by on the horse. :hehe: