A fast ride ends in disaster

Approach_Medium

Trainz Addict
Hello;
It looks like the speed dynamics are working well in TS2009!

I thought I would take a little ride on my route, the CSX Riverline.
I had set up the VT605 train in Teaneck, on the main track. I was doing some testing at the New Bridge road crossing, and had just installed the ATLS control.

I realize that this train doesn't belong on the River Line, let alone in the USA, but I picked it because I liked it's sleek looks<g>.

After moving north from Teaneck and completing the successful test of the new crossing in Bergenfield, I decided to continue north.
I set the controls to DCC mode, for the test. Now I ran the throttle full speed, and the train reached 200KPH (125 MPH).

I thought at this speed, I could reach Selkirk yard in one hour (actually a bit less), then I could go to sleep. It was already 23:30, and my eyes were getting a bit heavy.

The train raced northwards, and at that speed the gates at Old Hook road in Harrington Park weren't even fully closed by the time the train arrived.

I don't have all that much of this route finished yet; Just some signals between CP05 and CP22, and the crossings at New Bridge road and Old Hook road.

The train raced through Nyack, NY, and then I saw the Haverstraw tunnel coming up fast.
Going through the tunnel, I recalled the sharp bend in the track just out of the north portal.

Did I have realism turned on? Could my train derail?

Well, it did derail. Not just derailed... after the crash, I couldn't find the train for a minute.
I had to zoom back and look down the embankment towards the river. There it was all scattered on the ground. What a mess.
It was really sad to see that beautiful train lying wrecked way below the track bed.
But it's just a game, and that's what games are all about. Doing stuff that you could never do in real life!

Perhaps when I've got a bit more time I will take the whole trip from the south end of the River Line in Jersey City to Selkirk. I still have to install the switch levers (didn't have Trainz automatically place them), and signals, but I really just want to make sure the track itself is good all the way through.

At normal speed of a passenger train it would take at least 3 hours to reach Selkirk. There are some fairly slow sections on this line as it snakes along the river. I think the max is 50 for freight, 60 for passenger trains.
I could probably get away with 60mph all the way through, so I can do the trip in about 2 hours.

I'll say one thing; Trainz is a whole lot of fun for the $40 I paid for TS2009.
There's so much to do on this monsterous route that I can't get bored with it. Lost of texturing to do, signalling, crossings, etc, etc.
I have no idea of how many trains I could run on the route at once before my frame rates start to drop below acceptable levels, and I have never touched on AI.

Model railroaders say their layouts are never done. Well, I think that goes for Trainz layouts as well.
I just hope that I someday do finish texturing, and placing a decent number of buildings on this route.

I started out building a truly prototypical route, using Transdem and Google Earth.
I've got all the track where it belongs, but I really don't think I can get all the roads in.
I will get the crossings, measuring from GE and then using the Trainz ruler to place them along the track. This seems to work very well so far.

I find that a lot of the River Line runs in a "ditch" and you don't see much outside the train, so I really don't have to go overboard with scenery at great distances, except where there are special areas I want to model, like Bear Mountain, the Poughkeepsie Bridge, and the Catskill Trestle.

Sorry for getting so long, but I just wanted to share my fun and experience with Trainz.
I've learned my lesson about driving too fast<g>

FW
 
Last edited:
VERY COOL !

We all have moments like this . . . where we realize our returns far outweigh our $$ investments. I agree, if you are an ambitious builder . . . it will never be done and you will never be bored.

When you look at the big picture, even with all the ranting and raving that goes on around the forum, its still one of the best entertainment value ever out there . . . if you like trains. '

:):):)
 
I too have had some good driving sessions with TS09, and the program has gone way beyond the $40 that I spent for the last version. Heck, I've spent a lot more on some theater tickets that turned out to be one horrible show.

Lately I've been retesting my route after I've changed and updated some content using the replace-feature in Surveyor. I really like how the AI trains wait at signals instead of backing up or attempting to turn around because their signal didn't change fast enough.

The really nice thing about ths version is that it didn't crash on me like TRS2006 used to when I went into driver. I was able to drive for hours on the different branchlines and the mainline while running against yellow lights and opposing traffic.

When this version is finally cleaned up, this will be on terrific trains sim.

John
 
Back
Top