Why we like to take the train...

What they do ... They are not very good ... At what they do. DaHarrrrrr-Win awards !

Instead of a bus (which would have been faster), I took the train from Boston to Philadelphia, It took like 20 hours
 
Last edited:
What they do ... They are not very good ... At what they do. DaHarrrrrr-Win awards !

Instead of a bus (which would have been faster), I took the train from Boston to Philadelphia, It took like 20 hours

But the train is more fun, right!

Why 20 hours? There must've been a problem, or the old PC was still running the trains. I've done the Boston to Philadelphia run in about 5 hours back in the early 1990s.

John
 
Yes there must have been a problem on that 20 hour thing.

I use the train a lot here because there are so many of them and they are fast and comfortable and more enjoyable.A lot better than a bus too. My local station has a train every 15 minutes in both directions and a country where trains are tremendiusly used.
 
Yes it is a shame frogpipe.

We are getting to the stage in many places that the train companies are finding it hard to cope with the constantly rising number of passengers. Recently at the highest since the 1940's in Great Britain. We have had lines that were gone many decades ago re-opened in Scotland and that is now happening down in England as well now. A long time back on these forums, I said that between Glasgow and Edinburgh there are 4 quite sperate passenger rail routes going via different places. Doubt it any other 2 cities in the world have such a situation. Not 4 services on the same line but 4 distinct route lines.
 
Meanwhile we are spending money laying track were it was once ripped up... We were very foolish in the mid-century, selling track for scrap, and decimating right of ways that we sorely need now...
 
In WWII there were over 350 passenger trains through Altoona per day; now there are 3.

The PRR, NYC, and other RR's needed 4 or more tracks to handle the hundereds of freights daily; now you are lucky to see 70 freights per day on a 3 track mainline, that was once 4 tracked.

NS will eventually be 2 tracked, with passing sidings, and NS regularly underpowers freights, and tell them to get as far as they can up the "Hill", until they stall (then they send helpers, cut off from a passing train).

Tracks that were once used heavily, are now only used during derailments that block the mainline.

Once a track gets to such a delapiated condition with sinking sub-roadbed (like PC was: a standing derailment, just waiting to happen), all the ties and rails need to be replaced, and the entire sub-roadbed needs undercutting, cleaning, and re-balasting, with laying new ties, spikes, tie plates, pandol clips, joiner bars, and new rails ... which is esentually re-laying a brand new track and trackbed.

It probably costs more to quick patch a 4 track mainline (one track at a time), than to re-lay a once abandoned line from scratch.

As 50 passengers were awaiting the Pennsylvanian at the Altoona station, up track 4 came one of the several stinky NYC Garbage/Trash trains. Almost everybody was baffing, or running up the steps for fresher air. Nice conditions we have here, few trains, unergonomic user unfriendly scheduals, and overcrowded sparce trains. Makes sence.
 
Last edited:
Well that shows us who has the priority. Garbage or people, wait... who do we get more money for? This must be the airlines!

Your trip home by train sounds like a flight I took from OK City to Boston via Chicago a few years ago. The flight was delayed due to technical problems we were told. An hour later it was changed to, can't remember now, but later on it was weather related and canceled. This wasn't even a blizzard. It was a drizzly rain which is typical for Chicago, NYC, and Boston. United Airlines was the ONLY flight in the terminal that was canceled. The passengers were then left in limbo, and we were penalized by the airline for not taking the flight. What flight? This was the only flight we had, and you guys canceled it. You should have heard me when I spoke with UA main headquarters afterwards.

I think the airlines really don't like people freight, and would rather deal with boxes and packages. People cost extra money, take up more space with seats, and complain too much. I wouldn't doubt it if the railroads still think the same thing even now, long after the recreation of the passenger service we call Amtrak. I'm sure the once mighty 4-track mainlines being chopped down to 1 or 2 badly maintained ROW doesn't help, but then again it keeps the costs down as much as possible along with only moving cheap commodities like coal and garbage.

John
 
Back
Top