Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
:john259,
Yes, IF you can find a copy (NEW) of Ts2004, I would hope it would be easier. I've found a number of copies online, but I'm not at all sure that they're 1) Actually new, with unregistered serial numbers, and 2) the real software and not a pirated copy.
I have heard from a number of people that previously registered copies can't be sold off to anyone else and re-registered.
To the rest: So, to get the full spectrum of Trainz, one should go for the present deal (if you can afford to) of ordering a boxed copy of 2010 and get the free Ts2004?![]()
RBR material also runs on TRS2006.Oh and be aware that Razorback only runs in TRS2004 and John259 would like money from you for Razorback so be aware his advice to go TRS2004 has a financial bias.
Just to expand this a bit if I may.Then you may well have to choose between one of the two ways of actually running 2010 because in one mode in particular a lot of assets refuse to work or even perhaps show up.
By your logic TS2010 is worth less than TRS2004 because it has fewer service packs. But of course that's not a logical way to think of it, nor is saying "it's newer, therefore it must be better".
Instead, consider factors such as reliability, simplicity, compatibility, useful functionality and cost, then you'll realise why for people other than expert content creators I recommend TRS2004 at the moment.
Compared with TRS2004, TS2010 has two good new features: the higher terrain resolution and layers. It has two new features which are very questionable: SpeedTreez and CMP/CM3. It lacks some very useful features which were present in TRS2004: support for scenarios, PaintShed, fully operative built-in layouts, sessions and scenarios, and compatibility with the way many assets have actually been created.
John
I am not going to get involved in this 'dissagreement' again.
What I will say is this:- Look on this forum and see which posts complain most about which version. It isn't rocket science.
Angela
Current postings are perfectly valid for the comparison, more so than old postings.Ahum. The forum was "reset" in 2006 remember?
I'm not sure about the layouts but quite a few sessions definitely aren't operative.TS2009 has fully operative built-in layouts.
Only if you have the skills to adjust items to the TS9/T10 standard. Not many people can do that.Far more content is compatible with TS2009 than with TS2004.
I'm not sure about the layouts but quite a few sessions definitely aren't operative.
Only if you have the skills to adjust items to the TS9/T10 standard. Not many people can do that.
It seems that your main criterium for deciding which is the better product is the date in the title. IMHO that's a very shallow method of making a decision, but it makes you a marketing person's delight.
John
Current postings are perfectly valid for the comparison, more so than old postings.
John
RBR material also runs on TRS2006.
We are working on making our modern material run on TS2010 in compatibility mode. As a result of that work we hope it will also work on TS2009.
We are working on creating new material which will run on TS2010 in native mode.
We are a not-for-profit organisation. We offer our layouts, utilities, asset packs and a sample of our activities free of charge. We charge an annual subscription for the majority of our activities and this pays for our web hosting and software costs. I personally do not handle any of the financial transactions and nobody is making any money out of it.
I have repeatedly stated that I consider TS2010 to be the best option at the moment for content creators.
I object to your unsubstantiated insinuation. Please don't repeat it.
John
No, there's no conflict because I have no financial interests related to RBR or Trainz, and RBR hopes to have material available for TS2010 soon.You seem to be in an apparent conflict of interest