ugly trains

Thomas is just ugly in general; now before any of you jump down my smokestack, allow me to explain myself. The TV Character version of Thomas, at least, is ugly, as far as I'm concerned. Rev. Awdry did a fantastic job of sticking to the original proportions of the locos he based his characters on (thomas being an LB&SC class E2, Percy being a Peckett 0-4-0, Henry's a 'Black 5' 5MT 4-6-0, etc.) the fact the TV morons ruined such classic, graceful lines of british steam power by misshapennly cramming their shells onto Marklin mechanisms is appauling.

oh, and @pfx, ditto on your gripe...

The original series was in my opinion the best. George Carlin was the best narrator they had. And I thought Thomas was an 0-6-0 Terrier.....oh well, learn something new every day.
 
chf2.jpg
 
The original series was in my opinion the best. George Carlin was the best narrator they had. And I thought Thomas was an 0-6-0 Terrier.....oh well, learn something new every day.
Stepney is a Terrier (A1X). I thought Thomas was a 3F 'Jinty' at the start, until I learned that the Jinties never had extended water tanks.

And Ringo was the best narrator IMHO. He was so good I named my budgerigar after him.

@nathanmallard:

1. I like it. I like it a lot.
2. Not too crash-hot on the paint scheme, but I like the huge smoke deflectors.
3. The LMS. Who could hate them. I still prefer the unstreamlined locos though.
4. The mini A1/A3. Who could hate it either. Lovely clean lines, not disturbed by pipes, and the curved running board.

Kieran.
 
Yeah, I think people are misinterpreting my post now. I like all of the trains I listed, that post was in response to someone saying all European trains were ugly.
 
Well, the British ICE 125 looks like a pork sausage with wheels. Is that the best passenger train you guys can come up with? If it is it's a very ugly attempt. *faints at the sight of an ICE 125*
 
Last edited:
Well, the British ICE 125 looks like a pork sausage with wheels. Is that the best passenger train you guys can come up with? If it is it's a very ugly attempt. *faints at the sight of an ICE 125*
It's not the best passenger train we can come up with. Meet the APT:
4807681705_f8c03d66e0_z.jpg

Also, as this is an ugly trains thread, here's the Class 446, the ugliest thing to run in Britain:
1280px-Class_466011_at_Sheerness.JPG

OK, maybe not the ugliest. The 458 is pretty terrible:
1024px-458030_at_Clapham_Junction.jpg

The 460 is just horrible:
cd460007gtw270602.jpg
 
Last edited:
It's not the best passenger train we can come up with. Meet the APT:
4807681705_f8c03d66e0_z.jpg

Also, as this is an ugly trains thread, here's the Class 446, the ugliest thing to run in Britain:
1280px-Class_466011_at_Sheerness.JPG

OK, maybe not the ugliest. The 458 is pretty terrible:
1024px-458030_at_Clapham_Junction.jpg

The 460 is just horrible:
cd460007gtw270602.jpg

Those should be scrapped. The 446, 458, and 460 look like aliens...............................................O.o
 
I like the PRR R1, it looks like a fun-sized GG1. The wheels are photo-shopped on that electric, surely? It doesn't look like it can go round corners!
 
Last edited:
More ugly coming up! Let's start with the Q1:
SR_Q1_C1_at_York_Railfest.JPG

Ouch. By far the ugliest steam locomotive to run in the UK, perhaps the world?
This might of looked good if they'd tried a bit harder:
jnr_c53_43_1.jpg

No wonder nobody ordered this thing...
687.jpg
 
The Q1 was designed to use as little metal as possible, both to save weight (So that it had the highest route availability possible) and because it was designed as an austerity locomotive during WWII, so Oliver Bullied produced a design using the minimum amount of materials, and without any superfluous casings etc.

Despite having an.... interesting visual appearance, they did the job they were designed for very well....

Meyshollop
 
Another thing I realised when looking at Q1 pictures; the shape of the boiler covering had a reason. The sections are basically inverted U sections which only required simple rolling to produce the shape. As it was wartime, the railway workshops, like other industries, were short of skilled labour. Therefore it seems to me that one of the reasons that Bulleid chose this was to enable it to be done by semi-skilled labour. Interestingly there is a model of of a "Q1" pacific in the small collections of the National Railway Museum whose reason for being made is not known. A drawing of this by John Click, who worked with Bulleid, appeared recently in one of our Railway magazines (I forget which) so it may have been a joke on his part.
 
Back
Top