Why do route authors list their routes as TS2012 ready when they are not. I almost downloaded one but the Content Manager said it did not exist, yet it showed on the "black screen" stuff. So I went to download page. Fortunately it gives you the ability to examine each asset. Well, I found that quite a lot of them dated back to 2002 and 2004. Is that stuff TS2012 ready? I am sure some will say that if it appears at all it is compatible and the ready for TS2012 therefore the claim is valid.
If the route is listed as ok for TS2012 then that is probably ok since it will load, run and look terrible-correct?
If the route is listed as ok for TS2012 then that is probably ok since it will load, run and look terrible-correct?