I recently replaced "MP Track wood v2" by philskene with "slave-driver" high res track from USLW on my current route project. I was a little concerned how it might effect frame rates and performance being a high res track. My route also has some heavily forested areas with pofig's speedtreez. I was getting under 20 fps and stuttering at times in these heavily forested areas in native mode.
To my complete amazement after switching to slave-driver's high-res track the positive performance improvement is the difference between night and day. In these same areas of the route the frame rates are still showing about 20 fps but there is virtually no stuttering. Even at 14 or 15 fps the action is so smooth compared to what it was before the track change. This is with the tracking camera too. I've tested with different locos and rolling stock and still get much better results.
The point of my post is it looks like track can make a pretty significant difference in performance. Even if they are both showing error free.
To my complete amazement after switching to slave-driver's high-res track the positive performance improvement is the difference between night and day. In these same areas of the route the frame rates are still showing about 20 fps but there is virtually no stuttering. Even at 14 or 15 fps the action is so smooth compared to what it was before the track change. This is with the tracking camera too. I've tested with different locos and rolling stock and still get much better results.
The point of my post is it looks like track can make a pretty significant difference in performance. Even if they are both showing error free.