For Scottish.
The problem with saving routes exists in TS2010 as well - at least for me In the end I gave up and just kept saving under a new name. A bit like an inforced backup. Though it did create problems with my test scenarios. In another thread it was suggested that the original route was never edited and all changes to the route should be done through a scenario and layers. Maybe for the next route I build.
I had Trainz installed at quite a deep level in the disk structure and I also used rather long route names. So I was wondering if Trainz had a problem with very long directory paths and filenames. The other earlier comment about executing Trainz as an administrator may have some merit as well.
For rjhowie2.
I haven't split routes either but what I was thinking of was this:
Mark your route at convenient spots where a split could occur. I'd use an object that was completely out of place - such as lighthouses. The map tool in Surveyor will help.
Start with your best version of the route. Back it up or save as a 'known' version. Remove about two thirds of the baseboards and save as "Route name - part 1".
Reload the known route. Delete the third of the baseboards you didn't delete before. The delete half of the remainder (which would be a third of the original). Save as "Route name - part 2".
Reload the known route again and delete the two thirds that wasn't deleted before. Save as "Route name - part 3".
Edit the three parts individually and then merge.
You could practice on a dummy route to help decide if this is worth the effort.
OK - so its a bit of mucking around and may be more trouble than its worth. It would be a tradeoff against slowly editing your route.
Good Luck. I'd like to see the NIR route when its finished. I did a tour of Ireland back in September but did very little of Northern Ireland. My wife is not into trains at all. Although she did survive about half a day in the York National Railway Museum before deciding the old city was more interesting. I stayed.
Cheers
Paul