borderreiver
Well-known member
BTP 0-4-4T and Driving Van Composites to Diagrams 116 and 162.
The arrival of one hundred and ten Wilson Worsdell “O” Class 0-4-4T tank engines between 1894 and 1901 on the North Eastern Railway network displaced the one hundred and twenty-four veteran Fletcher Bogie Tank Passenger 0-4-4T engines from local passenger trains, making them redundant. Ever a company focused on getting its money’s worth from its motive power, the company set about rebuilding some of the twenty-six year-old engines in to 0-6-0T “290” Class tank engines. Some fifty engines were so treated between 1899 and 1908.
However, during 1899, in order to cut costs on some local passenger services, the company decided to fit a BTP 0-4-4T locomotive for push-pull work, coupled to a 52ft Bogie Diagram 116 Driving Van Composite. According to the N.E.R.A publication “Passenger Rolling Stock December 31[SUP]st[/SUP] 1906” one of these carriages, No. 2738, was converted from a 52ft Van Third during 1899 but none are listed for 1900 or 1901. This may have been an experiment for Wilson Worsdell and the company but I have no details of where carriage 2738 operated when it was the sole representative of the type. The push-pull system employed at this time was a mechanical one, using wires and pulleys, so was not configured for easy coupling/uncoupling. It is convenient to consider the configuration as a permanent set.
The company must have been satisfied with the potential of the concept, possibly under the stress of falling passenger receipts due to electric tram competition since conversions resumed in 1902. That year the build list shows No.286, was converted to diagram 116, with Nos.3272 and 3273 during 1903 along with Nos. 3447, 3448 and 3451 during 1904, bringing the total to seven. The main conversion build took place during 1905, adding nineteen carriages with a final nine followed during 1906, a total of thirty-five.
Unfortunately, the carriage returns for December 1906 show thirty-six diagram 116s in company stock. Working through the listings by number rather than build date revealed No.3442, built 1906. No. 3443 was in the build list for 1905 and in the number list, so possibly No. 3442 was turned out of the shops late in 1905/early in 1906 and was not written up in either year’s build record. It did make it on the number listing though.
While the N.E.R.A. publication is dated December 1906 the original was maintained, with handwritten entries until December 1912. Thus there is a gap between January 1913 and January 1923 as to the numbers allocated to new build carriages.
During 1908 the N.E.R. expanded the company stock of Driving Van Composites by building eighteen 52ft Bogie Diagram 162 Driving Van Composites. This brought the company stock of DVCs to fifty-four.
I have examined the North Eastern Railway Association’s publication “North Eastern Railway Passenger Engine Working 1[SUP]st[/SUP] July to 30[SUP]th[/SUP] September 1908” in order to discover where the Steam Autocars were allocated.
My first discovery was that in the 1908 document the company was mostly describing the steam autocars as “Engine with Single Coach” and “Engine with Coach at each end”, neatly differentiating between a BTP working as a Steam Autocar with a single Diagram 116 carriage and a BTP working with two Diagram 116 carriages. Hull Shed was the only dissenting site, merely describing theirs as “Steam Autocar” workings.
Below, from the shed turns, each turn is for a separate BTP and Coach(es). Timings mean no turns are shared between an engine.
1908 Northern Division. – 12 BTP Engines and 12 Carriages
Blyth Shed – Two Engine & Single Coach Turns, un-numbered.
Durham Shed – One Engine & Single Coach Turn, un-numbered.
Hartlepool Shed – Engine and Single Coach “Car A” and “Car B” Turns
Heaton Junction Shed – “Engine & Single Coach Turns” Nos. 1, 2 and 3
Sunderland Shed – One Engine & Single Coach Turn, un-numbered.
Tweedmouth Shed – Turn 5, 6 and 8 - Engine & Single Coach.
1908 Southern Division. – 16 BTP Engines and 18 Carriages
Darlington Shed – Turn 15 and 16 - Engine and Single Coach
Guisborough Shed – Turn 1 – Engine with Coach at each end
Haverton Hill Shed - One Engine & Single Coach Turn, un-numbered
Hull Shed – Two “Steam Autocar” Turns, unclear which configuration.
Leeds Shed - Turn 23 – Engine with Coach at each end
Middlesbrough Shed – Turn 11 - Engine and Single Coach
Saltburn Shed – Turn 1 – Engine with Coach at each end
Scarborough Shed – Turn 18 and 19 – Engine and Single Coach
Starbeck Shed - Turn 13 – Engine and Single Coach
Whitby Shed – Turn 11 and 12 – Engine and Single Coach
York Shed - Turn 20 and 21 – Engine and Single Coach
Even assigning two carriages to each of the Hull “Steam Autocars” I have identified thirty carriages. I believe that at least two further BTP engines and two, (or potentially three) DVCs were likely to have existed in order to provide maintenance cover, since no rolling stock fleet works on permanent 100% availability. I am assuming that one engine and single coach was on the Northern Division, and possibly one engine with a coach at each end on the Southern Division, cycling through the sheds to release two sets for servicing/repair each week. This would then account for thirty auto-fitted BTP engines and thirty-three carriages.
I do not believe that the N.E.R. expanded the number of auto-fitted B.T.P. engines coupled to DVCs during 1908 but I do believe that the new diagram 162s were used to produce nine twin sets, which in turn permitted the released diagram 116s to expand the number of diagram 116 twin sets.
Thus far I have not identified a photograph of a mixed diagram 116 and 162 set and the given wisdom is that the BTP Steam Autocars mostly operated as twin sets. However, it seems from the 1908 Passenger Engine Working document that was not the case up until then, at least officially. Twenty-three of the twenty-nine sets explicitly operated coupled with a single carriage. Of the sets operating as an engine with a coach at each end all six listed during 1908 were in the southern division. If there was a deviation from this then it did not make it in to the document. Perhaps it was in the special traffic notices until incorporated in to a subsequent Passenger Engine Working document. Unfortunately, there does not seem to be a subsequent N.E.R. document which has survived the passage of time.
The book I have on the Consett branch, “The Railways of Consett and NW Durham” by G Whittle has a photograph of a BTP Steam Autocar at Westwood station and it clearly is the engine with a coach at each end type. In my opinion this dates the photograph to after 1908 and probably not the period 1899 – 1908. Children on the platform are dressed in the style associated with “The Railway Children”.
The arrival of one hundred and ten Wilson Worsdell “O” Class 0-4-4T tank engines between 1894 and 1901 on the North Eastern Railway network displaced the one hundred and twenty-four veteran Fletcher Bogie Tank Passenger 0-4-4T engines from local passenger trains, making them redundant. Ever a company focused on getting its money’s worth from its motive power, the company set about rebuilding some of the twenty-six year-old engines in to 0-6-0T “290” Class tank engines. Some fifty engines were so treated between 1899 and 1908.
However, during 1899, in order to cut costs on some local passenger services, the company decided to fit a BTP 0-4-4T locomotive for push-pull work, coupled to a 52ft Bogie Diagram 116 Driving Van Composite. According to the N.E.R.A publication “Passenger Rolling Stock December 31[SUP]st[/SUP] 1906” one of these carriages, No. 2738, was converted from a 52ft Van Third during 1899 but none are listed for 1900 or 1901. This may have been an experiment for Wilson Worsdell and the company but I have no details of where carriage 2738 operated when it was the sole representative of the type. The push-pull system employed at this time was a mechanical one, using wires and pulleys, so was not configured for easy coupling/uncoupling. It is convenient to consider the configuration as a permanent set.
The company must have been satisfied with the potential of the concept, possibly under the stress of falling passenger receipts due to electric tram competition since conversions resumed in 1902. That year the build list shows No.286, was converted to diagram 116, with Nos.3272 and 3273 during 1903 along with Nos. 3447, 3448 and 3451 during 1904, bringing the total to seven. The main conversion build took place during 1905, adding nineteen carriages with a final nine followed during 1906, a total of thirty-five.
Unfortunately, the carriage returns for December 1906 show thirty-six diagram 116s in company stock. Working through the listings by number rather than build date revealed No.3442, built 1906. No. 3443 was in the build list for 1905 and in the number list, so possibly No. 3442 was turned out of the shops late in 1905/early in 1906 and was not written up in either year’s build record. It did make it on the number listing though.
While the N.E.R.A. publication is dated December 1906 the original was maintained, with handwritten entries until December 1912. Thus there is a gap between January 1913 and January 1923 as to the numbers allocated to new build carriages.
During 1908 the N.E.R. expanded the company stock of Driving Van Composites by building eighteen 52ft Bogie Diagram 162 Driving Van Composites. This brought the company stock of DVCs to fifty-four.
I have examined the North Eastern Railway Association’s publication “North Eastern Railway Passenger Engine Working 1[SUP]st[/SUP] July to 30[SUP]th[/SUP] September 1908” in order to discover where the Steam Autocars were allocated.
My first discovery was that in the 1908 document the company was mostly describing the steam autocars as “Engine with Single Coach” and “Engine with Coach at each end”, neatly differentiating between a BTP working as a Steam Autocar with a single Diagram 116 carriage and a BTP working with two Diagram 116 carriages. Hull Shed was the only dissenting site, merely describing theirs as “Steam Autocar” workings.
Below, from the shed turns, each turn is for a separate BTP and Coach(es). Timings mean no turns are shared between an engine.
1908 Northern Division. – 12 BTP Engines and 12 Carriages
Blyth Shed – Two Engine & Single Coach Turns, un-numbered.
Durham Shed – One Engine & Single Coach Turn, un-numbered.
Hartlepool Shed – Engine and Single Coach “Car A” and “Car B” Turns
Heaton Junction Shed – “Engine & Single Coach Turns” Nos. 1, 2 and 3
Sunderland Shed – One Engine & Single Coach Turn, un-numbered.
Tweedmouth Shed – Turn 5, 6 and 8 - Engine & Single Coach.
1908 Southern Division. – 16 BTP Engines and 18 Carriages
Darlington Shed – Turn 15 and 16 - Engine and Single Coach
Guisborough Shed – Turn 1 – Engine with Coach at each end
Haverton Hill Shed - One Engine & Single Coach Turn, un-numbered
Hull Shed – Two “Steam Autocar” Turns, unclear which configuration.
Leeds Shed - Turn 23 – Engine with Coach at each end
Middlesbrough Shed – Turn 11 - Engine and Single Coach
Saltburn Shed – Turn 1 – Engine with Coach at each end
Scarborough Shed – Turn 18 and 19 – Engine and Single Coach
Starbeck Shed - Turn 13 – Engine and Single Coach
Whitby Shed – Turn 11 and 12 – Engine and Single Coach
York Shed - Turn 20 and 21 – Engine and Single Coach
Even assigning two carriages to each of the Hull “Steam Autocars” I have identified thirty carriages. I believe that at least two further BTP engines and two, (or potentially three) DVCs were likely to have existed in order to provide maintenance cover, since no rolling stock fleet works on permanent 100% availability. I am assuming that one engine and single coach was on the Northern Division, and possibly one engine with a coach at each end on the Southern Division, cycling through the sheds to release two sets for servicing/repair each week. This would then account for thirty auto-fitted BTP engines and thirty-three carriages.
I do not believe that the N.E.R. expanded the number of auto-fitted B.T.P. engines coupled to DVCs during 1908 but I do believe that the new diagram 162s were used to produce nine twin sets, which in turn permitted the released diagram 116s to expand the number of diagram 116 twin sets.
Thus far I have not identified a photograph of a mixed diagram 116 and 162 set and the given wisdom is that the BTP Steam Autocars mostly operated as twin sets. However, it seems from the 1908 Passenger Engine Working document that was not the case up until then, at least officially. Twenty-three of the twenty-nine sets explicitly operated coupled with a single carriage. Of the sets operating as an engine with a coach at each end all six listed during 1908 were in the southern division. If there was a deviation from this then it did not make it in to the document. Perhaps it was in the special traffic notices until incorporated in to a subsequent Passenger Engine Working document. Unfortunately, there does not seem to be a subsequent N.E.R. document which has survived the passage of time.
The book I have on the Consett branch, “The Railways of Consett and NW Durham” by G Whittle has a photograph of a BTP Steam Autocar at Westwood station and it clearly is the engine with a coach at each end type. In my opinion this dates the photograph to after 1908 and probably not the period 1899 – 1908. Children on the platform are dressed in the style associated with “The Railway Children”.
Last edited: