Show off your reskins!

some more locomotives I repainted lately ^^
a SD60
a SD 9 (my personal favorite locomotive)
and a U50 ^^
JQEYNX.jpg
ef9PFc.jpg
0eJOfJ.jpg
 
The problem with both of those is that they're more or less specific to their railroad. If possible, I like to usually do something somewhat unique in terms of the "look" of my power. What this means varies on the ubiquity of the locomotive. The Greenbriers had common C&O trademarks such as their low headlights, the special type of numberplate, and the high numberboards kind of throw the idea of skinning those locomotives into LE&E down the drain. Much the same can go for the Reading T1, as those were homebuilt locomotives modded from 2-8-0s. Maybe one day I'll find something I like, but for now, I'm satisfied with what I have. :)

And guys, cut it out about the reskinning thing. What I reskin on payware models won't be released without permission, as it's a private railroad. Some of the freeware stuff might be released, but I wouldn't get your hopes up for a mega-LE&E release in the near future.
 
Last edited:
All of the above details are highly appreciable...
Permissions are indeed important, generally for freeware. Payware generally prevents skin distribution by the license, and so it doesn't really matter. Modification for personal use is a general "yes" - the strictest reskin/mod policy I have ever seen simply stated that screenshots of the modified assets were not to be uploaded. Freeware permissions are always a good thing to ask for, even if the license completely allows it. It pays to be sure. Some people allow full releases, others allow private releases or ask to be sent the modified asset first to ensure release and quality control. Each person might have a different approach.
Take, as an example, a request by Jackson to reskin my Virginia & Truckee larger moguls into an LE&E predecessor when complete. Similarly to the aforementioned Greenbriers and Reading T1s, the larger V&T moguls are fairly exclusive. Whatever the detail differences, they are 8-28D drawing 6, while most 8-28Ds were drawing 1 or 8. Drawing 6 has some unique features, such as an eastern-style cab, dual crosshead-driven injectors, and a different wheelbase. However, "clones" could exist most places in the 1870s and 1880s, and so it would be entirely feasible that a drawing 6 mogul could have been produced about the same time for a completely different road. However, to ensure an accurate Baldwin paint style, I asked that I be allowed to do the skin myself, rather than giving him my skin kit. As a result, his engine will be authentic Style 1, with custom type faces specific to that railroad despite the loco and paint being catalog standard(as per historical accuracy). The end result will be an utterly unique and attractive locomotive, well-produced for a fictional road with a very real flare. Had he not asked, that would never have occurred.
Payware, however, is generally a different story. Fictional payware modifications are not unheard of, but they are seldom if ever released. Payware license generally allows private modification for personal use; however, private or public release is almost always prohibited. Thus, the locos will stay on Jackson's computer.
Either way, nice fleet.
 
All of the above details are highly appreciable...
Permissions are indeed important, generally for freeware. Payware generally prevents skin distribution by the license, and so it doesn't really matter. Modification for personal use is a general "yes" - the strictest reskin/mod policy I have ever seen simply stated that screenshots of the modified assets were not to be uploaded. Freeware permissions are always a good thing to ask for, even if the license completely allows it. It pays to be sure. Some people allow full releases, others allow private releases or ask to be sent the modified asset first to ensure release and quality control. Each person might have a different approach.
Take, as an example, a request by Jackson to reskin my Virginia & Truckee larger moguls into an LE&E predecessor when complete. Similarly to the aforementioned Greenbriers and Reading T1s, the larger V&T moguls are fairly exclusive. Whatever the detail differences, they are 8-28D drawing 6, while most 8-28Ds were drawing 1 or 8. Drawing 6 has some unique features, such as an eastern-style cab, dual crosshead-driven injectors, and a different wheelbase. However, "clones" could exist most places in the 1870s and 1880s, and so it would be entirely feasible that a drawing 6 mogul could have been produced about the same time for a completely different road. However, to ensure an accurate Baldwin paint style, I asked that I be allowed to do the skin myself, rather than giving him my skin kit. As a result, his engine will be authentic Style 1, with custom type faces specific to that railroad despite the loco and paint being catalog standard(as per historical accuracy). The end result will be an utterly unique and attractive locomotive, well-produced for a fictional road with a very real flare. Had he not asked, that would never have occurred.
Payware, however, is generally a different story. Fictional payware modifications are not unheard of, but they are seldom if ever released. Payware license generally allows private modification for personal use; however, private or public release is almost always prohibited. Thus, the locos will stay on Jackson's computer.
Either way, nice fleet.
Well said! That clears up a lot of misunderstandings for newer members such as myself. Thank you
 
Me and one of my best friends wanted to come up with a new railway for commuters, and other passenger things and so this happened.
1uMZR5.jpg

Don't know why I chosen an GP38-2, but it looks ok :3
 
Back
Top