Regarding built-in content license policy

[haddock56]

Go be number 25 who uploads a route with that name to the DLS after the two original versions of Auran. First dates back to February 2012, so if they had any problems with someone (again) uploading a changed version of that route N3V had more then enough time to act. Or go be number 12 who uploaded a session with that name.

I'm actually aware of that. Saw the amount of different ones, but I've decided to forget about it for now. I've enough on my plate with the other two projects I'm currently working on.

 

[mjolnir]

I, too, respect the rights of content creators, but take a bit more leniency towards the registration issue. I don't think it reasonable, proper, or just, for the first response to an unregistered user to consist only of "won't help you 'til you register". I'm more likely to answer a question, or even a few questions in different posts, and include a "by the way, you might want to register" line in the response somewhere. But because I was once both a prospective user, and a new user with an unregistered copy (although truth to tell, I bought my first copy at a store, and had it installed long before I subscribed to the forums), I'm inclined to always help a prospective user, and will offer limited help for a reasonable time to an unregistered new user.

I'm not saying to completely ignore the standards, but in the long run, it benefits the community more if we do it as teachers, rather than enforcers.

ns