Having tried it out and read these posts here is my opinion, for what it is worth. Because it is a small route in terms of MB I assumed it would probably be pretty poor or even rubbish. Which just shows how wrong you can be when making assumptions. The scenery is good to the point of excellence. The Railway Infrastructure is good. As for the turnouts being too short there is a rule to bear in mind when consructing them. "The longer the switch. the higher the line speed". I was driving over your short switches at 10 mph which looked and felt fine. You only need to change them if you want higher line speeds. Talking of which, I didn,t come across any speed limit signs. You should have some. The coal Industry is also excellent. I especially like the yard filled with empty coal trains waitint to go to the Collierys to be filled. It adds a sense of realism for me. There is scope here for creating jobs for people joining the session. I would sugest the the first name of an Industry should be the location where it is to make it easier to identify for players. As an example, All industries in Sheridan should be named " Sheridan ....etc! etc!. I noticed you have done that with a number of Industries already. There are also a number of locations where I felt there ought to be an Industry but wasn,t. I did notice in this thread you are already are of that. And, yes I did notice the MIN you forgot to name, LOL. The biggest downside is I,m working on a signalling project, unrelated to Trainz, which means I don,t have too much time for it these days. This is also partly do to the fact N3V Games scewed up MP.