Blutorse4792
Now T:ANE I can get into
In 1946, a bad accident at Naperville, Illinois (in which an 85mph CB&Q train rear-ended a stopped CB&Q train) led the U.S. government to cap passenger train speeds at 79mph, unless the equipment had cab signals installed (which they had to pay for themselves). This effectively led to a two-decade hiatus of any innovation in train speed, until the U.S. government began researching high-speed rail in 1965 (by which point, American passenger rail was essentially in its death throes). Prior to this, speeds of 90-100mph were common on passenger trains in the midwest, and remained so, in some cases, until Amtrak assumed their services in 1971.
While the passenger train was more-or-less doomed with the rise of the automobile, if the Naperville accident hadn't happened, and the speeds had never been limited by federal law, how would high-speed rail have developed differently in the United States? Do you think we would've seen any more innovation during those 20 years, as the railroads tried desperately to compete with highways and early air travel?
While the passenger train was more-or-less doomed with the rise of the automobile, if the Naperville accident hadn't happened, and the speeds had never been limited by federal law, how would high-speed rail have developed differently in the United States? Do you think we would've seen any more innovation during those 20 years, as the railroads tried desperately to compete with highways and early air travel?