Been my experience that people who attempt amateur psychoanalysis usually need therapy themselves. "Should be safe" but not likely - my current route under development in TS2010 got tested today in TS12 - 32 unknown KUIDs, all of which are built into TS2010, all available on the DLS but CM 3.5 don't have a clue what they are. If I uploaded the route tonight it would be build 3.3, would work perfectly in TS2010, would have 32 missing dependencies in TS12. Minimum build 3.3 is no guarantee that it will work.
Are the kuid's in your route the same as the updated versions on the DLS? The reason I ask is you are aware that when content is "built-in" that it doesn't get screened for error checking or even technically put in the database. It's contained in the JA file which is a whole separate entity. To my knowledge anyway they are trying to get all the built-in assets updated and put on the DLS. Which can be quite a daunting process actually and if you're only missing 32 you should actually consider yourself lucky. I suspect that they are there but they have updated kuids
The bottom line is you're mad, I can get it. Not everybody is ever going to be happy. But when you come out of the box and say things like there is no way to determine whether something is faulty or not before you download it, and I easily show you two ways to do it, then you go on complain about the lack of this or lack of that. It's clear you're never going to be satisfied.
Why don't you just delete it, stick with 2010 which you are apparently happy with, and move on with life instead of hanging around on the forums spreading misinformation.
That's going to quickly get you the reputation of being an anti-Auran/N3V troll. It may be too late for that with some people. Because no amount of complaining is going to make Auran/N3V change their minds and implement compatibility mode for example,or increase the shadow polys, or get rid of speedtreez or backtrack on anything they have implemented in TS12. It's just not gonna happen.
If you actually turned your talent to trying to help people adapt to the new version and get more copies sold, then the Trainz franchise will probably go on for another 10 years. But if you and all the other naysayers try to kill as much business as you can for Auran/N3V. Then we might have another bankruptcy and this time it might be final, then where were your precious route be? You'll have to go out and get your own web hosting to put it up.
Have you ever heard the old saying "cutting off your nose to spite your face?"
Because I'm not advocating glossing over glaring deficiencies, but picking gnat crap out of pepper, I can do the same thing with 2010 or 2009 or any of the TC's or 2006 or 2004 or UTC. None of them were perfect. But each one was better than what came before it.
I learned during the bankruptcy just how close it was to losing it all. Some people obviously just don't care but I am one who does. Some people just care about themselves, I take a more philosophical approach and actually care more about community sometimes than my own personal pleasure.
Do I like correcting misinformation? No I really don't. But every time it's put out there and I see it I'll try to correct it. Now obviously you seem to have some kind of problem with that, and I guess in the long run that's just your problem:hehe:
