thegrindre
narrow gauge fanatic
Been experimenting a little more and run into this funny issue.
Here's the set up; I'm sending two trains from opposite directions on the route to meet at one of the loops. (Doesn't matter which one, just to meet.) And, they do at the right loop with a 'mexican stand off'. OK, I decide to place another signal on a stub line, which happens to be where I'm starting one of the trains from, and they meet again as usual but this time, one of the trains backs up and decides to take the passing loop this time. Question is, why didn't the train take the passing loop to begin with when approaching it instead of going through the 'mexican stand off' thing and then backing up to take the passing loop??? It had about a 1/4 mile to make the decision to take the passing loop before it got there... (Strange...)
Here's the set up; I'm sending two trains from opposite directions on the route to meet at one of the loops. (Doesn't matter which one, just to meet.) And, they do at the right loop with a 'mexican stand off'. OK, I decide to place another signal on a stub line, which happens to be where I'm starting one of the trains from, and they meet again as usual but this time, one of the trains backs up and decides to take the passing loop this time. Question is, why didn't the train take the passing loop to begin with when approaching it instead of going through the 'mexican stand off' thing and then backing up to take the passing loop??? It had about a 1/4 mile to make the decision to take the passing loop before it got there... (Strange...)
