JonMyrlennBailey
Well-known member
Please tell me what you think.
The motherboard in my gamer has slots for not one but TWO M.2 solid state drives. Right now, I have Windows 11 on the SATA solid state drive but have TANE, TS2022 as well as their respective data folders on the only one M.2 drive I have right now and that drive is in the slot closest to the CPU on my MSI motherboard.
I have been playing around with my machine and it seems that Trainz graphics quality worsens if both TANE SP4 and its data folder are installed both on the single M.2 drive I have. There was not as much frame shudder when TANE SP4 was on the C/SATA drive along with Windows while the TANE data folder only was on the M.2 drive. I believe the data in the data folder is all the information Trainz uses to render images of the Route world while a Session is being driven.
I believe the graphics-rendering performance goal is to configure Trainz on the hardware so that the data folder where all the Route map information is kept has as little bottleneck as possible.
I am thinking about buying a SECOND M.2 drive to put in the vacant slot.
I am thinking about then
1. using the SATA drive for Windows 11
2. using the M.2 drive in the slot closest to the CPU strictly for Trainz data
3. using the SECOND M.2 drive for the Trainz installation only
Is this a smart scheme for hardware usage to maximize Trainzing graphics performance on screen? My goal is to have those images of railroad trains moving across the screen as smoothly as possible thus minimizing jitter. I want the most fluid on-screen animation.
Is it just as well to install Trainz on the C Drive along with Windows while having a single M.2 drive dedicated for the Trainz local data?
A few other questions about Trainz settings.
How do the following settings, all else equal, affect smoothness or fluidity of image movement on screen?
1. post processing?
2. anti-aliasing?
3. vertical sync, full or half?
4. render behind camera?
Is half sync preferred on a Trainz route heavy in 3-D content as dense forests?
The motherboard in my gamer has slots for not one but TWO M.2 solid state drives. Right now, I have Windows 11 on the SATA solid state drive but have TANE, TS2022 as well as their respective data folders on the only one M.2 drive I have right now and that drive is in the slot closest to the CPU on my MSI motherboard.
I have been playing around with my machine and it seems that Trainz graphics quality worsens if both TANE SP4 and its data folder are installed both on the single M.2 drive I have. There was not as much frame shudder when TANE SP4 was on the C/SATA drive along with Windows while the TANE data folder only was on the M.2 drive. I believe the data in the data folder is all the information Trainz uses to render images of the Route world while a Session is being driven.
I believe the graphics-rendering performance goal is to configure Trainz on the hardware so that the data folder where all the Route map information is kept has as little bottleneck as possible.
I am thinking about buying a SECOND M.2 drive to put in the vacant slot.
I am thinking about then
1. using the SATA drive for Windows 11
2. using the M.2 drive in the slot closest to the CPU strictly for Trainz data
3. using the SECOND M.2 drive for the Trainz installation only
Is this a smart scheme for hardware usage to maximize Trainzing graphics performance on screen? My goal is to have those images of railroad trains moving across the screen as smoothly as possible thus minimizing jitter. I want the most fluid on-screen animation.
Is it just as well to install Trainz on the C Drive along with Windows while having a single M.2 drive dedicated for the Trainz local data?
A few other questions about Trainz settings.
How do the following settings, all else equal, affect smoothness or fluidity of image movement on screen?
1. post processing?
2. anti-aliasing?
3. vertical sync, full or half?
4. render behind camera?
Is half sync preferred on a Trainz route heavy in 3-D content as dense forests?