How many people can not run Trainz on their laptop ?

I wouldn't say a super computer is needed, but it does need to be fairly powerful. This is because Trainz is mainly processor-oriented, and has to handle a large amount of calculations every second in the game. In addition to this, the graphics card also has to handle a lot of information being sent to the monitor.

Consoles on the other hand usually work differently anyway due to their compact nature.

What I will say though is that older integrated graphics chips like older Intel Express chips, will not handle Trainz properly at all.

Shane
 
Essentially the problem is the content and how it is placed. The plus side of user created content is that you get a lot of variety, the downside is some isn't as efficient as it could be. If its created on a high end machine and it works fine then the content creator is happy. If you have a lower end machine you're not so happy.

Each asset has a roughly 500 poly equivalent overhead associated with it so if your layout designer uses lots of small signs at the station with the name on then stations need a lot more computer power to give the same frame rate. A game that is professionally designed each screen will have a poly budget and the station will have the sign as textures on a larger asset.

Pick your content carefully and repeat the same wagon or carriage then Trainz can run on a lower end machine especially if you adjust the performance sliders. Use content created in sketchup and smaller assets and not even a super computer will give decent frame rates.

Consoles have the advantage of being a controlled environment, each PC is slightly different, there are advantages and disadvantages to each approach the PC is more flexible and can run a wider range of software such as Blender to create content. TS2009 dose use the GPU rather more than earlier versions and the on board GPUs aren't as powerful as the stand alone cards. In general laps tops use more expensive components that are designed to conserve battery life not for performance. People do run Trainz on them but it isn't recommended, a desktop PC with a separate video card is.

Cheerio John
 
..., or substandard laptop with "turdo boost" is not capable of running Trainz ?
that just about answers your own question.
...
While with other video games, they have superior (more realistic) graphics than Trainz does. And those other PC games have no problems, on lower end PC's ?

Why do X-Box and Playstation games have more realistic looking graphics, than Trainz does ?
those supposedly superior (realistic) games don't allow you to go anywhere or see anything the designer doesn't want. Many of their super graphics are pre-baked, much like those old western towns or Hollywood sets with their false fronts. Go behind the scenes and you see it is all fake.
People should be more forwarned, that lower end laptops, and slow desktops, may not run Trainz at all, and those specs: (CPU 3.4 GHz / 1-2 Gb video card, 4Gb RAM) should be made more public and bolder, (instead of being typed in micro fine print).
it has never been a secret, being mentioned innumerable times it these very forums.
What exactly is the reason that Trainz so radicly different, and is more highly CPU / Video Card demanding, than other PC games, and other console games ?
see previous
I would guess that Trainz assets have a rediculously high poly count, and the Trainz draw distance is in several miles viewing distance, where as other video games only view several yards ahead, not miles.
view distance as well as other quality settings are user selectable.

Sounds like someone who wants to join the Indy500 with the family flivver and then complains he can't keep up. :hehe:
 
"194 posts and no registered copy?"

finished-pirate.png


Yo ho ho and a bottle of rum.
 
I guess ignorance is bliss! I bought a laptop, then looked at trainz, ordered it, and everything works fine! I have a Toshiba Satellite L675, triple core AMD, Win 7 home premium. I'm happy with it all. The laptop does pour out some heat though!!! But I've monitored the temp and it only gets a little over 50%. Just wish I had the real temp!!!
 
I have a Dell 1545 purchased in '09 with Pentium T4200 @ 2.2ghz. with 2 gigs of RAM and integrated graphics. I run TS2009 and TS2010 fairly well. I am looking to purchase a desktop as soon as I sell one of my cars and cannot wait to see the difference!
 
I have the Dell Inspiron 1545 that I got in 09 also. Mine has the Pentium T3400 @ 2.16Ghz and 4GB of RAM. I only ran Trainz 2006, classics 1 and 2, and 2009 on it. Never tried 2010 out. Trainz runs pretty good if you have Gamebooster.
 
I do have an Alienware M17x which runs Trainz TS12 very well. It does get very, very hot though and will not run on battery if I'm using Trainz. There's a BIOS warning regarding using intense graphics and processing and being on battery. This laptop, by the way, is built for gaming and comes with a discrete video card which is suited for game playing. This is a lot different than most laptops which use nothing more than a chip on the motherboard and share the RAM with the rest of the system.

John
 
John,

What size is the video card? Is it an Nvidia card? I am thinking of replacing mine, which runs TS09 well, but it is an ATI Radeon with only 1GB.

Regards,

Dave
 
Doesn't take a super computer at all to run Trainz, it just takes a computer that is capable of running games like train sims, flight sims, and a host of other games that require a fast processor and a good GPU . My PC brand new is about $600 total, a desktop, and I get around 60-75 FPS most of the time. Laptops generally don't have the GPU that is needed to run a game, unless you get one deisgned for gaming. You want to run games on a laptop, it is going to cost you alot more than you would spend on a desktop, to get good performance. Here are some good laptops to consider. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2020688,00.asp
 
Last edited:
I do have an Alienware M17x which runs Trainz TS12 very well. It does get very, very hot though and will not run on battery if I'm using Trainz. There's a BIOS warning regarding using intense graphics and processing and being on battery. This laptop, by the way, is built for gaming and comes with a discrete video card which is suited for game playing. This is a lot different than most laptops which use nothing more than a chip on the motherboard and share the RAM with the rest of the system.

John

That is a good laptop for gaming, but but is not cheap. I think some folks think they can buy an $900 laptop at Best Buys and run games on it, and that isn't going to work.
 
Finally they are starting to describe laptops in Big Box stores, a Dell having a 17" screen, 8Gb RAM, 1Tb HD, a 2Gb Nvidia 650 video card, CPU 2.4GHz-3.4 GHz Turdo Boost @ $ 900-$1000 USD (shop in Delaware and avoid the Pa 6% sales tax) Everything is cheaper in Delaware !

What is the processor, besides the clock frequency?
 
What is the processor, besides the clock frequency?

The instruction set differs for a start. The big problem for cpus is getting the data into the cpu and back out to memory so memory cache and caching algorithms (ie software) play a big part in overall performance. Other things such as the number of cores, availability of hyperthreading and other things come into play as well.

Cheerio John
 
I think some folks think they can buy an $900 laptop at Best Buys and run games on it, and that isn't going to work.

$900 should buy you a fairly capable machine at Best Buy. The Sony I got about a year ago for $950 had a 2.3GHz Core i5, 4GB RAM, and 512MB Radeon graphics. It runs TS12 decently.

Curtis
 
Since I can't afford to buy a new one, I just update my hardware when the time comes. To be able to run TS12, I replaced the MoBo along with a new cpu (AMD Athlon II X2 250 Processor, can update to a quad core when funds permit,) with 4 gigs of DDR2 ram, Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT Graphics card. all together this little upgrade only cost me $230.00 (MoBo, CPU, and Ram) to do. so far TS12 is running petty well for me. -Robert-

P.S. My old computer is a Desktop.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top