Help me with signal works incorrectly

[NTSON]

Dear friends, I'm from Vietnam and I'm working on Vietnamese signal system, which based on "chinaxhj-5x-JZ" <kuid:582228:4008007>. However, this signal doesn't work properly as I expected. I understand that there's a misunderstanding between "go straight" and "diverge" of the junction. Please help me finding solution to this problem. Thank you so much!!!

It must display "green" only for proceeding and "1 yellow" only for caution.

However, the signal works correctly with 3 branches junction:

 

[p-dehnert]

There are 3 possible direction for a junction lever (left, straight and right). Straight is used only for 3way junctions. For a 2way junction Trainz doesn't know, which is the straight path. You could create 2 versions of the signal (left diverge and right diverge).

Peter

 

[NTSON]

There are 3 possible direction for a junction lever (left, straight and right). Straight is used only for 3way junctions. For a 2way junction Trainz doesn't know, which is the straight path. You could create 2 versions of the signal (left diverge and right diverge).

Peter

I've tried it but it seems to be not working with the case of 3 (or more) tracks station.

Moreover, I saw some signals have junction configurating, for example: Safetran CLight Signal 06 RD <kuid2:45324:24356:4>

How can I get these add-ons, or script like this for my signal?

 

[TSwenson]

I would find the author of the scripted signals and message them to see if you could use their script in some way.

Trainz signals are super basic and don't "look" past the initial junction. I used to solve this with additional hidden signals, but that begets its own problems. As I model mostly US content, now I tend to use those Safetran signals when I need scripted ones. I hope it is as simple as replacing the mesh with the Vietnamese style, I suspect not... but hope so anyways.

 

[NTSON]

I would find the author of the scripted signals and message them to see if you could use their script in some way.

Trainz signals are super basic and don't "look" past the initial junction. I used to solve this with additional hidden signals, but that begets its own problems. As I model mostly US content, now I tend to use those Safetran signals when I need scripted ones. I hope it is as simple as replacing the mesh with the Vietnamese style, I suspect not... but hope so anyways.

Thank you so much! I'll really appreciate if I can use their script or create a new one somehow. This is my first time modelling signals in Trainz. There's been such problems that I've to deal with.
Once again, thank you so much for your help!

 

[AdvancedApproach]

I would find the author of the scripted signals and message them to see if you could use their script in some way.

Trainz signals are super basic and don't "look" past the initial junction. I used to solve this with additional hidden signals, but that begets its own problems. As I model mostly US content, now I tend to use those Safetran signals when I need scripted ones. I hope it is as simple as replacing the mesh with the Vietnamese style, I suspect not... but hope so anyways.

@H222 this is why I'm proposing signal enhancements.

 

[norfolksouthern37]

@H222 this is why I'm proposing signal enhancements.

I am unable to post in the suggestion boxcar because of a forum error, but what S301 said in the other thread is the gist. There simply isn't a great way to make the system more complex while still giving the flexibility to model many different signal systems world wide. Some such as myself have made changes to suit an even more granular logic and operation such as the junction list indexing that is required in this thread, but still even then sometimes has to be more or less generic. I have even considered breaking the logic down into selectable rule sets, but the effort for such undertakings is massive and sadly nobody pays me to develop signal systems the way they pay me to make locomotives.