Kennilworth
Active member
Hi David
There are two path rules, “jsTRF Path Control” by brummfondel (kuid2:192081:16:2) which is on the DLS and “Path Rule” by _mutton_ (kuid2:71155:60006:4) which is built in to later versions of Trainz.
They both work in a similar way, the main difference being that the brummfondel one requires all the signals along a path to be named. The other difference is that the brummfondel one will find the path ahead automatically in the editor when you enter the name of the first signal on the path so it is just a matter of switching the junctions in the editor until you set the path to where you are going. The _mutton_ one requires each junction to be entered and set individually and so takes a little longer to set up.
In addition each rule has an associated driver command “PathControl setpath” for the brummfondel one (kuid2:192081:6:2) and “Path Command” for the _mutton_ one (kuid2:71155:60007:1). These allow you to set the required path for each train in the driver commands. They also each have an “Autodrive”, brummfondel (kuid2:192081:4:4) and “Autopilot Command”, _mutton_ (kuid2:71155:60001:5) which in effect just tell the train to keep driving until it reaches or passes the target trackmark.
I put some instructions on how to set up the _mutton_ rule in this thread (post 4) some time ago http://forums.auran.com/trainz/showthread.php?101288-Path-Rule-Troubles&highlight=path+rule.
Personally I prefer to use the brummfondel rule as it can be used alongside his "jsTRF Path Trigger" (kuid2:192081:15:4) to automate much of the driver command route selection. For example on the ECML route I have paths set up for trains to access any of the platforms at King's Cross and the driver command is simply Autodrive to the required platform trackmark. When the train activates the Path trigger it automatically sets up the path to that particular trackmark without any other intervention.
If you are just using one of the rules to check if the trackmark is valid, I would use the _mutton_ one as it requires less preparation but if you have already named the signals then I would suggest the brummfondel one.
Regards
Brian
There are two path rules, “jsTRF Path Control” by brummfondel (kuid2:192081:16:2) which is on the DLS and “Path Rule” by _mutton_ (kuid2:71155:60006:4) which is built in to later versions of Trainz.
They both work in a similar way, the main difference being that the brummfondel one requires all the signals along a path to be named. The other difference is that the brummfondel one will find the path ahead automatically in the editor when you enter the name of the first signal on the path so it is just a matter of switching the junctions in the editor until you set the path to where you are going. The _mutton_ one requires each junction to be entered and set individually and so takes a little longer to set up.
In addition each rule has an associated driver command “PathControl setpath” for the brummfondel one (kuid2:192081:6:2) and “Path Command” for the _mutton_ one (kuid2:71155:60007:1). These allow you to set the required path for each train in the driver commands. They also each have an “Autodrive”, brummfondel (kuid2:192081:4:4) and “Autopilot Command”, _mutton_ (kuid2:71155:60001:5) which in effect just tell the train to keep driving until it reaches or passes the target trackmark.
I put some instructions on how to set up the _mutton_ rule in this thread (post 4) some time ago http://forums.auran.com/trainz/showthread.php?101288-Path-Rule-Troubles&highlight=path+rule.
Personally I prefer to use the brummfondel rule as it can be used alongside his "jsTRF Path Trigger" (kuid2:192081:15:4) to automate much of the driver command route selection. For example on the ECML route I have paths set up for trains to access any of the platforms at King's Cross and the driver command is simply Autodrive to the required platform trackmark. When the train activates the Path trigger it automatically sets up the path to that particular trackmark without any other intervention.
If you are just using one of the rules to check if the trackmark is valid, I would use the _mutton_ one as it requires less preparation but if you have already named the signals then I would suggest the brummfondel one.
Regards
Brian
Last edited: