It completely depends on a lot of factors and what individuals define as what is a Class I railroad...
The term "Class I" normally refers to a formal definition of what constitutes a "Class I" railroad. How some "individual" might define the term is irrelevant.
Although the definition for "Class I" in the U.S. has changed over the years, the classification was always based on
annual revenues. In the present time (2013), for example, the Surface Transportation Board classifies railroads as follows:
- Class I - $250 million or more
- Class II - $20 million or more
- Class III - $0 to $20 million
However, in 1939 a Class I railroad was defined as having operating revenues of at least $1 million annually. The figures changed to $3 million in 1956, $5 million in 1965, $10 million in 1976, $50 million in 1978, and $250 million in 1993.
In 1900 there were 132 Class I railroads. Today there are seven. So yes, believe it or not, many railroads that you personally might not consider to be a "Class I" railroad may
have been in fact a "Class I" railroad during another era.
NYS&W was hardly a Class 1 by any means, but again, its all in who you ask. Commonly, its bee accepted the Southern Railway the first true Class 1 to dieselize fully. Retired the last steam engine in 1952. This was due to a lot of factors. Southern's money maker, the CNO&TP "Rathole" Division at the time featured somewhere around 15 tunnels on its grade. Long, curved and low in clearance they nearly choked the crews on steam engines. The CNO&TP was the first division to be fully dieselized on SOU.
Southern was also on this big 'be the leader in technology' kick in the late 40's and early 50's, so it goes without saying.
Cheers,
Woody
You can't use today's definition of "Class I" when making historical comparisons. The question isn't whether the the NYS&W is a Class I
today, but whether it was a Class I
during the era in question. Doing otherwise would be "moving the goal posts"...