Engines Wishlist for Jointed Rail.

[judahGrice]

the H3 GP60M is real

 

[chris2001trainz2010]

Alright, just checking.

 

[ThePoliceman009]

I wonder where this little guy went...

 

[chris2001trainz2010]

Look at hert's picture in the March 8th to March 15th screenshot competition. Looks like it's still alive, somewhere...

 

[AMTRAKwannabe]

the H3 GP60M is real

I do believe it's H4 though. The stripes look different than H3.

 

[Chadd04]

I wonder where this little guy went...

Its probably waiting for a cab.

 

[judahGrice]

I do believe it's H4 though. The stripes look different than H3.

Yeah. It's not called H4, though. I think it's H3b. I like it a lot better than regular H3

 

[haddock57]

BNSF should've stuck with the H2. H3 looks awful, especially in new paint like that. The H2 beats it by a long shot.

 

[jkinzel]

I believe we should go back to pre 1970 paint schemes. Assuming that will never happen, the H-1 works for me. The H-3 is horrid.

 

[jonwray]

I prefer H3 because it looks.... modern. But the pre-BN paint schemes are a close second.

 

[jkinzel]

I prefer H3 because it looks.... modern. But the pre-BN paint schemes are a close second.

That is why I don't like it, too modern. To me railroad schemes seem to look better when done with class and sophistication. H-3 affects me the same way the SP speed lettering does, it just doesn't work. It would look good on a 747, but not on a locomotive.

 

[pdkoester]

That is why I don't like it, too modern. To me railroad schemes seem to look better when done with class and sophistication. H-3 affects me the same way the SP speed lettering does, it just doesn't work. It would look good on a 747, but not on a locomotive.

But, I enjoy SP speed lettering, now, since there is no more SP. :'(

 

[jkinzel]

I would have lived with the speed lettering had the SP survived.

 

[jonwray]

What about a GO Transit MP36/MP40 (I don't remember)? All other projects to build them have given up/been dormant for 2+ years...
(Photo taken by me)

 

[Chadd04]

 

[ehamerstone]

Note this is not only coming from me but from the others who have already constantly requested these units:

JointedRail do AC44's

AC4400's JR

JR the AC44CW's

Requests for days.

Some more -8's
JR some B40-8's

B32-8's JR

JR the C32-8's

Some Safety Cab Units:
Do C44-9WL's JR

JR some C40-8M's:

Some SD60Fs JR:

JointedRail hear me out on this one.

 

[Chadd04]

I swear if I see one more request for the AC44's....

 

[KickingRocks]

I swear if I see one more request for the AC44's....

I feel the same way about the requests for some rusted out, 40-year-old piece of junk that should be torched. The point being, we all have our own areas of interest.


However, hounding the team doesn't do anyone any good. JR is likely extremely busy, and they'll release the AC4400s when they see fit.

 

[pdkoester]

My mistake, I qualify as the doofus this time.

 

[KickingRocks]

Dude, really? I mean really? 40 year old? Do the math doofus! They weren't built in 1975!
[TABLE="class: infobox bordered"]
[TR]
[TH="align: left"]Model
[/TH]
[TD]AC4400CW
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TH="align: left"]Build date
[/TH]
[TD]1993 – 2004
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


DUH!

If you would have bothered to read my previous posts in this thread, you would know that I'm eagerly awaiting the AC4400s. The post in which you quoted (regarding the "40-year-old junkers") was in reference to the numerous requests for GP40s, SD40s, and other "aged" units, some of which are available from other vendors. Put simply, I was voicing my support for the AC44s.


Is this simple enough for you to comprehend, or shall I reduce it even further?