M mp202 Active member Aug 9, 2012 #1 Which would be easier to build into a custom built loco? Automatic running Numbers or renameable running numbers?
Which would be easier to build into a custom built loco? Automatic running Numbers or renameable running numbers?
M mity22 New member Aug 9, 2012 #2 I would think Auto numbers but I could be wrong that is what I would try.
norfolksouthern37 what's a normal map? Aug 9, 2012 #3 there should not be any differences in applying them except one will require an arn script. all arn does is generate a number to insert automatically into 'renamable' numbers.
there should not be any differences in applying them except one will require an arn script. all arn does is generate a number to insert automatically into 'renamable' numbers.
M mp202 Active member Aug 9, 2012 #4 I meant which script would be easier to apply to a locomotive your building?
norfolksouthern37 what's a normal map? Aug 9, 2012 #5 only arn is a script that creates a number to enter into the renamable that is built in. not applying a script would be easier but you would have to add the number by hand every time you use.
only arn is a script that creates a number to enter into the renamable that is built in. not applying a script would be easier but you would have to add the number by hand every time you use.