Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dr. Beeching is infamous for his 1963 governmental report 'the re-shaping of Britain's railways' - many a branch line once serving rural communities up and down the land were closed down following his recommendations to streamline the rail network across the UK. One has to remember that all railway branch lines closed before, during and after his actions were important feeder lines for the main line routes such as the East-Coast Main line running between London and Edinburgh for example.
The former March- Chatteris -St. Ives branch line was a victim of his policies, and thus this East Anglian route was closed in 1963, and yet the Wisbech - March branch line somehow survived fully intact until 1968 passenger closure and afterwards hung on with minimal freight traffic until 2000. It was simple economics and low passenger numbers that in the end finally killed off the former March - Wisbech - King's Lynn through route (not a Beeching cut as some people have wrongly assumed) as his 1963 report recommended this line was to stay fully open. However, the Wisbech line is still in place as it was never closed fully in 1968 - and is currently now attracting wide interest from the towns of both March and Wisbech, Wisbech Town Council, Fenland District Council, Cambridgeshire County Council, Network Rail and the Government Ministry of Transport as a feasible new passenger service linking my home town to Cambridge (the capital of this fine county).
^^^
Well.. as man power and infrastructure becomes more expensive, it's only logical that we see a shift. It becomes too expensive to run trains in low populated areas as that can be done much cheaper by buses or cars. Trains are left with high-demand services in or between highly populated areas, and railways get abandoned in other areas. But population growth and denisification can lead to the need of renewing abandoned railways. So I conclude that it's logical to close railways if there are no users (and the reason for that is NOT bad service quality or speed), but it would be wrong to sell the land. The best would be to make a cyclepath in it's place so the railway can easily be reinstated if needed.
In my country there are still many services stopping literally in the middle of a forest. It means the trains get slowed down, and the many passengers from the bigger cities choose faster alternatives - express buses or cars. It should be the other way around - big masses from big cities use fast trains while few people from villages use the bus or cars.
Those stops are mainly for the people living near the station which sometimes is just 3 or 4 families. They are not used by people who live further that walking distance from the stops. As cruel as that sounds, I would close those stops and make the people use the bus (or even gift the families a car) so the train could achieve higher speeds. The company would lose a couple passengers per forest stop but gain dozens from the cities up the line who will find the faster travel more appealing. And they pay more because they travel the longer distance.This is surely very understandable...
With trains stopping in the middle of nowhere, no wonder people are opting for better service. If they have to swap to a bus or car, they may as well as do that right off instead of needing to switch in the middle of their journey. Commuting is a bit different where getting around a big city is a lot easier on public transportation.
For once I'm glad that my country had a bit of totalitarian past - stuff got built without askingThese are un-affectionately called NIMBYS, or Not In My Back Yards folk.
Abandoned before completion
![]()