Railroads launch automated train shutdown clock

freight_rail_010614getty.jpg


The group that lobbies for freight rail companies in Washington has launched a countdown clock to a "rail shutdown" if Congress does not extend a deadline for automating most of the nation's trains.

Railroads currently have until Dec. 31 to install the an automated navigation system known as Positive Train Control automated navigation system - which regulates the speed and track movements of trains - but several rail companies have warned they will shut down service in January 2016 if the deadline is not moved.
"Railroads have warned for years that the December 31 deadline for implementing positive train control (PTC) was impossible to meet," the Association of American Railroads (AAR) said in a post on its website noting are 28 days left until a potential service interruption because "train systems cannot be shut down or restarted overnight."
"Railroads have spent nearly $6 billion and hired thousands of workers to install this state-of-the-art technology, but without congressional action, railroads will have little choice but to shut down or severely limit rail traffic," the post continued. "Disruptions would negatively impact the U.S. economy and affect everyone, including farmers, manufacturers, consumers, water treatment facilities, rail passengers, energy companies, government agencies and beyond!" The mandate that was set in the aftermath of a 2008 commuter rail crash in California, but railroads say they need more time to complete the implementation.
Rail companies have argued that they will no choice but to shut down service at the beginning of next year to avoid fines if Congress does not move the deadline.
A bipartisan measure has been introduced in the House that would push back the deadline for most railroads to install the automated train technology until December 2018. Critics have complained the measure is a "blanket extension" that lets railroads off the hook for improving safety for passengers, however.
"It has been more than 45 years since the National Transportation Safety Board first urged railroads to implement positive train control — an unacceptable delay in implementation of this critical, life-saving technology that has allowed numerous, preventable tragedies," Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said in a statement after the House measure was introduced.
"Extensions should be granted only to railroads that have demonstrated diligent, good faith efforts to meet the mandate," he continued. "Only by holding railroads’ feet to the fire will this critical, life-saving technology finally be implemented.”
Supporters of the extension say it is necessary to prevent an interruption in passenger and freight rail service at the end of the year, however.
"Completion of the Positive Train Control mandate by the end of the year is not achievable, and extending the deadline is essential to preventing significant disruptions of both passenger and freight rail service across the country,” House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman Bill Shuster (R-Pa.) said in a statement trumpeting the extension.
“Railroads must implement this important but complicated safety technology in a responsible manner, and we need to give them the necessary time to do so," he continued.
Transportation department officials in the Obama administration have said they have little choice but to enforce the mandate unless Congress can come to agreement on an extension.
"The reality is without Congress doing something, we've got a deadline coming up and we're going to have to enforce that deadline," Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx told reporters earlier this week.
"Many of the concerns [railroads] raise appear to be legitimate concerns, but as far as we're concerned, the deadline at present is what it is and we have to enforce against it, absent some congressional action," Foxx continued.
 
Sometimes I wonder whether PTC will always prevent a train from rear ending a train, that is in front of it, that has been stopped by PTC ... There always will be some glitch, and a chance with a signal not showing "STOP", in time.
 
Sometimes I wonder whether PTC will always prevent a train from rear ending a train, that is in front of it, that has been stopped by PTC ... There always will be some glitch, and a chance with a signal not showing "STOP", in time.

My thoughts exactly... Norfolk Southern's auto-router is a good example of how non human operated train control sucks lol. It cant deal with problems that it created so it stops mainline traffic.
 
Are government is ****ed up and they need to be stopped what a waste of money.

We are talking about a system that stops a train if it tries to go through a red signal. It's been used in Europe for years, well they have even more complex ones. It does save lives so I suppose you have to ask if governments are in the business of saving lives or not.

Cheerio John
 
Back
Top