First of all, my apologies if my choice of headline caused a few perches to sway in the breeze – I shall take more care in future (assuming the existence of a meaningful future). Nevertheless, as is so often the case in these Forums, it did produce a response from someone who was at least trying to be helpful.
Secondly apologies for the length of this response. I suppose I could have saved time and effort by writing this in the first place.
It seems that most seem to have missed the point of my “odd moan”, and it may be that I’ve got it all wrong and there good elegant means to accomplish what I want, in which case I apologise (again). I do fully appreciate the efforts of a large number of content creators getting their constructs up to speed with the latest tinkerings within Trainz. I also know that I don’t have to accept all updates; I am aware of that, simply because of the 893 (now 899) updates available to me, 32 are left over from all previous updates received. These all arrived from time to time, many of them several months ago, and are those which I chose not to use (the assets to which they refer having been deleted or disabled earlier). Unless there is something I am not aware of (admittedly, quite possible) it seems that I cannot get rid of these 32 from my list of available updates.
So now I continue as I have in the past. I find out which of my assets are out of date, and compare that list with the list of available updates, and produce another list of those updates I want to take on board. That’s not an unreasonable task with a couple of dozen items, but with 899 …………?
Wanting to make a selection from the updates available means of course that I can’t use the “Download All” function, which in turn means that (unless there is something else I don’t know, which again is, I suppose, not improbable), I will have to select each update I want/need and download and install them individually. Assuming I need only half of the available updates, that’s well over 400, any one of which could take from 30 seconds to several minutes – and will still have well over 400 on my list, amongst which the next arrivals will be interspersed?
I am retired, and probably have more time to play than many another – and many of those others (most in fact) will have more patience than I, but the process described above sounds even less enticing than watching paint dry! (And on a philosophical note, having more time does not mean that Maybe this goes somewhere near to explaining the losing the will etc.
I first bought Trainz a number of years ago, and have kept with it for a long time, reasonably quietly getting on with it (admittedly with one or two moans from time to time). Strangely enough I bought it to play the game.- increasingly over the last 2/3 years I have, however, been caught up in delving into config files etc, mending assets, searching for missing dependencies etc, etc. Now I’m spending hours bringing assets up to date.
IT’S NOT WHAT I BOUGHT IT FOR.
I have seen and heard the good reasons and the excuses about NV3 being a small organisation operating in a niche market on minimal margins etc, etc. But surely they must realise that satisfactory customer experience is an important factor. It appears to me that half the traffic on the forums boils down to asset management, with the same issues arising time after time, to no apparent effect. Surely some effort spent on improving the customer experience, even if it doesn’t in itself produce extra revenue, may be worth more in the long term than “new, better” versions of Trainz, which within a few weeks of release, are up for sale with a 30% (or more) price reduction.
I’m sure I’m not the only customer who wants to get on with it without having to fiddle about with programming etc. I avoided it during 20 years of working in and with IT, and I don’t want it now.